Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

<i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3AQM95NBJ3" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:QM95NBJ3 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001899" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216624001899</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.003" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.003</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    <i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This study seeks to explore the pragmaticalization process of (it's) no biggie, through a corpus-based taxonomical and statistical examination. The research study involves (i) elaborating a taxonomy of no biggie constructions by exploring the variability of the pragmatic functions and the syntactic features associated with the construction; (ii) monitoring the links between the taxonomical types of no biggie and the parameters of syntactic loci and structure of the construction (e.g. absence of it's); and (iii) determining habitual lexical items that co-occur with the construction. The findings show that the vast majority of (it's) no biggie constructions are used in its abbreviated form no biggie, half of which being employed as a discourse-pragmatic marker (DPM). The correlations between syntactic loci and the taxonomy were tested through Chi-square, which demonstrates that specific pragma–syntactic properties are orderly assigned to extended forms, and that pragmaticalized free-standing constructions (as with DPMs) are generally used in the middle of a clause. The analysis of no biggie collocates also indicates that the pragma-syntactic function of the collocates is oftentimes subject to the syntactic function of the construction types. Finally, a qualitative examination of the taxonomy and their examples confirms that pragma-syntactic variation occurs differently in all the taxonomical types, the DPM no biggie showing the highest degree of variation.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    <i>No biggie</i> can be a “biggie”: A taxonomical and statistical analysis of the pragmaticalization of <i>no biggie</i> on the basis of pragma-syntactic variation and co-occurring lexical items

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This study seeks to explore the pragmaticalization process of (it's) no biggie, through a corpus-based taxonomical and statistical examination. The research study involves (i) elaborating a taxonomy of no biggie constructions by exploring the variability of the pragmatic functions and the syntactic features associated with the construction; (ii) monitoring the links between the taxonomical types of no biggie and the parameters of syntactic loci and structure of the construction (e.g. absence of it's); and (iii) determining habitual lexical items that co-occur with the construction. The findings show that the vast majority of (it's) no biggie constructions are used in its abbreviated form no biggie, half of which being employed as a discourse-pragmatic marker (DPM). The correlations between syntactic loci and the taxonomy were tested through Chi-square, which demonstrates that specific pragma–syntactic properties are orderly assigned to extended forms, and that pragmaticalized free-standing constructions (as with DPMs) are generally used in the middle of a clause. The analysis of no biggie collocates also indicates that the pragma-syntactic function of the collocates is oftentimes subject to the syntactic function of the construction types. Finally, a qualitative examination of the taxonomy and their examples confirms that pragma-syntactic variation occurs differently in all the taxonomical types, the DPM no biggie showing the highest degree of variation.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Journal of Pragmatics

  • ISSN

    0378-2166

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    234

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2024-12-01

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    US - Spojené státy americké

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    1-15

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001348731200001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus