Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Chemistry Teachers' Opinion of Chemistry Education

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F14%3A10323808" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/14:10323808 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Chemistry Teachers' Opinion of Chemistry Education

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Teachers&apos; awareness of their students&apos; attitudes towards a subject is an integral part of their teacher competences. Nevertheless, researches conducted in the field of attitudes towards science usually aim only at students. This paper is focused on partial results of a research conducted on secondary schools chemistry teachers. The research followed one conducted on students (Rusek, 2013). Both the students and the teachers were given the same questions only in conversed formulation, e.g. for students &quot;Chemistry lessons are boring.&quot; and for teachers &quot;My students find chemistry lessons boring.&quot; The questionnaire used consisted of three parts: general attitudes, didactical means used in education and attitudes towards particular topics of chemistry education. This paper deals with the first part of the questionnaire. It was created using the typical attitude questions (Prokop, Tuncer, &amp; Chudá, 2007; Veselský &amp; Hrubišková, 2009). One of the differences between the questionnaire for students and teachers was a set of extra questions enlisted in the first half of the teachers&apos; questionnaire. As it was designed for grammar school as well as vocational school teachers, a question about the reason of chemistry education at schools where science is marginal was added. Another added question was about the classic chemistry education system organic chemistry - inorganic chemistry - organic chemistry - biochemistry, i.e. question to find out if teachers (especially those at vocational schools) think about integration or alternative educational approaches. Surprisingly, the results of the questionnaire (not only in its first part) do not differ between the two groups of teachers (N = 118) even though the hypothesis was vocational school teachers will present lower values of opinion about chemistry education. Particular questions and teachers answers are discussed in the paper.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Chemistry Teachers' Opinion of Chemistry Education

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Teachers&apos; awareness of their students&apos; attitudes towards a subject is an integral part of their teacher competences. Nevertheless, researches conducted in the field of attitudes towards science usually aim only at students. This paper is focused on partial results of a research conducted on secondary schools chemistry teachers. The research followed one conducted on students (Rusek, 2013). Both the students and the teachers were given the same questions only in conversed formulation, e.g. for students &quot;Chemistry lessons are boring.&quot; and for teachers &quot;My students find chemistry lessons boring.&quot; The questionnaire used consisted of three parts: general attitudes, didactical means used in education and attitudes towards particular topics of chemistry education. This paper deals with the first part of the questionnaire. It was created using the typical attitude questions (Prokop, Tuncer, &amp; Chudá, 2007; Veselský &amp; Hrubišková, 2009). One of the differences between the questionnaire for students and teachers was a set of extra questions enlisted in the first half of the teachers&apos; questionnaire. As it was designed for grammar school as well as vocational school teachers, a question about the reason of chemistry education at schools where science is marginal was added. Another added question was about the classic chemistry education system organic chemistry - inorganic chemistry - organic chemistry - biochemistry, i.e. question to find out if teachers (especially those at vocational schools) think about integration or alternative educational approaches. Surprisingly, the results of the questionnaire (not only in its first part) do not differ between the two groups of teachers (N = 118) even though the hypothesis was vocational school teachers will present lower values of opinion about chemistry education. Particular questions and teachers answers are discussed in the paper.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2014

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Teaching and Learning Science at All Levels of Education

  • ISBN

    978-83-7271-880-8

  • Počet stran výsledku

    5

  • Strana od-do

    139-143

  • Počet stran knihy

    190

  • Název nakladatele

    Pedagogical University of Krakow

  • Místo vydání

    Krakow

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly