Can Virtual Dissection Replace Traditional Hands-on Dissection in School Biology Laboratory Work?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F18%3A10383098" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/18:10383098 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83679" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83679</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83679" target="_blank" >10.29333/ejmste/83679</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Can Virtual Dissection Replace Traditional Hands-on Dissection in School Biology Laboratory Work?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
With the advent of computers virtual dissection was recognized as a plausible option for the replacement of hands-on dissection. Based on survey data collected from 489 Czech Biology teachers it was revealed that teachers value positively both variants of dissection, even more, differences are small or even negligible. Differences on motivation scale toward both variants are small or negligible too. From the answers based on motivation scale, we can construct a ghost teacher as someone who recognizes both alternatives of dissections as interesting, and even pleasant and fun activities. However, dissection should be performed as mostly as self-regulated activities with perceived benefits for the students as the dominant incentive, while not recognizing activity as important. The differences exist both between the acceptability of different kind of organisms for hands-on and virtual dissection, and in the actual school practice. In the long term perspective is cohabitation of both variants most probable.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Can Virtual Dissection Replace Traditional Hands-on Dissection in School Biology Laboratory Work?
Popis výsledku anglicky
With the advent of computers virtual dissection was recognized as a plausible option for the replacement of hands-on dissection. Based on survey data collected from 489 Czech Biology teachers it was revealed that teachers value positively both variants of dissection, even more, differences are small or even negligible. Differences on motivation scale toward both variants are small or negligible too. From the answers based on motivation scale, we can construct a ghost teacher as someone who recognizes both alternatives of dissections as interesting, and even pleasant and fun activities. However, dissection should be performed as mostly as self-regulated activities with perceived benefits for the students as the dominant incentive, while not recognizing activity as important. The differences exist both between the acceptability of different kind of organisms for hands-on and virtual dissection, and in the actual school practice. In the long term perspective is cohabitation of both variants most probable.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
ISSN
1305-8215
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
TR - Turecká republika
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1415-1429
Kód UT WoS článku
000429004200026
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—