Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

An Examination of Different Methodological Approaches in Student School Behavior Research: The Issue of the Incomparability of Student Self-assessments

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F18%3A10384382" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/18:10384382 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-4-627" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-4-627</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2018-4-627" target="_blank" >10.5817/PedOr2018-4-627</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    An Examination of Different Methodological Approaches in Student School Behavior Research: The Issue of the Incomparability of Student Self-assessments

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The issue of school educational outcomes measurement is of great concern to both researchers and practitioners. We can distinguish two main types of outcomes: outcomes in the domain of academic achievement (e.g., mathematics, information and communication technologies, and history) and outcomes in the behavioral domain (school discipline). Both types of outcomes are assessed and graded in schools. However, if we were to let different teachers assess the same students&apos; knowledge and skills, their assessment would frequently differ and the same applies to their assessments of student behavior. The following question arises: How accurately do we measure school educational outcomes? In our study we aim to address the following issues: (a) describe the most commonly used methodological approaches to student school behavior measurement and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Speciically, we focus on school documentation analysis, interviews, observations, and questionnaire surveys. The section about school documentation analysis focuses on empirical analysis of the selected school documents of particular Czech schools; (b) propose an innovative approach to student school behavior measurement combining student self-reports and peer-reports with the anchoring vignette method to enhance data comparability.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    An Examination of Different Methodological Approaches in Student School Behavior Research: The Issue of the Incomparability of Student Self-assessments

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The issue of school educational outcomes measurement is of great concern to both researchers and practitioners. We can distinguish two main types of outcomes: outcomes in the domain of academic achievement (e.g., mathematics, information and communication technologies, and history) and outcomes in the behavioral domain (school discipline). Both types of outcomes are assessed and graded in schools. However, if we were to let different teachers assess the same students&apos; knowledge and skills, their assessment would frequently differ and the same applies to their assessments of student behavior. The following question arises: How accurately do we measure school educational outcomes? In our study we aim to address the following issues: (a) describe the most commonly used methodological approaches to student school behavior measurement and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. Speciically, we focus on school documentation analysis, interviews, observations, and questionnaire surveys. The section about school documentation analysis focuses on empirical analysis of the selected school documents of particular Czech schools; (b) propose an innovative approach to student school behavior measurement combining student self-reports and peer-reports with the anchoring vignette method to enhance data comparability.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA17-02993S" target="_blank" >GA17-02993S: Faktory ovlivňující sebehodnocení ICT dovedností studentů středních škol</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Pedagogická orientace

  • ISSN

    1211-4669

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    28

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    36

  • Strana od-do

    627-662

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus