What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11410%2F21%3A10428670" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11410/21:10428670 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=IoVMUbJXHU</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411" target="_blank" >10.1080/13691457.2021.1934411</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Quality of public services including social services is an issue frequently discussed by policy makers, service providers, and by those who represent service users. The aim of this study was to explore how stakeholders perceive quality of social services, with a particular focus on (1) what did participants rate as important; (2) what is the relative importance of each domain and how does that differ across stakeholder groups and (3) does importance vary by participant characteristics. A specially designed questionnaire was completed by 217 service providers, by 249 public administration representatives and 205 service users of residential care and in-home support. The subjective quality of life of service users was rated as the most important indicator of service quality by all three stakeholder groups. Particularly important were items that related to the nature of the relationships and interactions between staff and service users. There were some differences between stakeholder groups and also by respondent characteristics - public administration respondents, older service users and providers of residential care were more likely to rate health care as more important than other respondents. Implications for how quality is measured are discussed.
Název v anglickém jazyce
What matters while assessing quality of social services? Stakeholders' perspective in Czechia
Popis výsledku anglicky
Quality of public services including social services is an issue frequently discussed by policy makers, service providers, and by those who represent service users. The aim of this study was to explore how stakeholders perceive quality of social services, with a particular focus on (1) what did participants rate as important; (2) what is the relative importance of each domain and how does that differ across stakeholder groups and (3) does importance vary by participant characteristics. A specially designed questionnaire was completed by 217 service providers, by 249 public administration representatives and 205 service users of residential care and in-home support. The subjective quality of life of service users was rated as the most important indicator of service quality by all three stakeholder groups. Particularly important were items that related to the nature of the relationships and interactions between staff and service users. There were some differences between stakeholder groups and also by respondent characteristics - public administration respondents, older service users and providers of residential care were more likely to rate health care as more important than other respondents. Implications for how quality is measured are discussed.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50302 - Education, special (to gifted persons, those with learning disabilities)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/7E13019" target="_blank" >7E13019: Making Persons with Disabilities Full Citizens - New Knowledge for an Inclusive and Sustainable European Social Model</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Social Work [online]
ISSN
1468-2664
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2021
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
5
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
20
Strana od-do
864-883
Kód UT WoS článku
000658207300001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—