Information disclosure in elections with sequential costly participation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11640%2F22%3A00556776" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11640/22:00556776 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/25840886:_____/22:N0000030
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00938-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00938-2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00938-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11127-021-00938-2</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Information disclosure in elections with sequential costly participation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Using a pivotal costly voting model of elections in which voters privately have formed preferences over two candidates and act sequentially, I study how different rules for disclosing information about the actions of early voters affect the actions of later voters, and how they ultimately affect voters' and candidates' welfare. Comparing three rules observed in real-life elections (no information disclosure, turnout disclosure and vote count disclosure), I find that vote count disclosure dominates the other two rules in terms of both voter welfare and the ex-ante likelihood of electing the candidate preferred by the majority. I show further that each of the rules can provide a candidate with either a greater or lesser chance of winning, depending on the levels of ex-ante support for the candidates. The findings may be useful for designing optimal voting procedures, particularly in settings with small numbers of voters.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Information disclosure in elections with sequential costly participation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Using a pivotal costly voting model of elections in which voters privately have formed preferences over two candidates and act sequentially, I study how different rules for disclosing information about the actions of early voters affect the actions of later voters, and how they ultimately affect voters' and candidates' welfare. Comparing three rules observed in real-life elections (no information disclosure, turnout disclosure and vote count disclosure), I find that vote count disclosure dominates the other two rules in terms of both voter welfare and the ex-ante likelihood of electing the candidate preferred by the majority. I show further that each of the rules can provide a candidate with either a greater or lesser chance of winning, depending on the levels of ex-ante support for the candidates. The findings may be useful for designing optimal voting procedures, particularly in settings with small numbers of voters.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GJ19-18741Y" target="_blank" >GJ19-18741Y: Efektivnost volebních politik při nákladné volbě</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Public Choice
ISSN
0048-5829
e-ISSN
1573-7101
Svazek periodika
190
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3-4
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
28
Strana od-do
317-344
Kód UT WoS článku
000713913700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85118364774