Are virtues national, supranational, or universal?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F14%3A00075490" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/14:00075490 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-223" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-223</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-223" target="_blank" >10.1186/2193-1801-3-223</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Are virtues national, supranational, or universal?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Many studies investigated cultural differences in values, most notably by Hofstede and Schwarz. Relatively few have focused on virtues, a related and important concept in contemporary social science. The present paper examines the similarities and differences between nations, or blocks of - culturally related - nations on the perceived importance of virtues. Adults (N=2809 students) from 14 countries were asked to freely mention which virtues they found important to practice in daily life, and next to rate a list of 15 virtues, which reflect the most frequently mentioned categories in The Netherlands, as found in a previous study. The 14 nations included the United States, Mexico, nine European and three Asian nations. For the free-listed virtues, we compared the top-ten lists of most frequently mentioned virtues across the nations. We used a correspondence analysis on the frequency table to assess the relationships between the virtues and nations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Are virtues national, supranational, or universal?
Popis výsledku anglicky
Many studies investigated cultural differences in values, most notably by Hofstede and Schwarz. Relatively few have focused on virtues, a related and important concept in contemporary social science. The present paper examines the similarities and differences between nations, or blocks of - culturally related - nations on the perceived importance of virtues. Adults (N=2809 students) from 14 countries were asked to freely mention which virtues they found important to practice in daily life, and next to rate a list of 15 virtues, which reflect the most frequently mentioned categories in The Netherlands, as found in a previous study. The 14 nations included the United States, Mexico, nine European and three Asian nations. For the free-listed virtues, we compared the top-ten lists of most frequently mentioned virtues across the nations. We used a correspondence analysis on the frequency table to assess the relationships between the virtues and nations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
SpringerPlus
ISSN
2193-1801
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
DE - Spolková republika Německo
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
223-234
Kód UT WoS článku
000359038600002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—