Strategic maneuvering quasi-logically : a case study of Perelman's probability

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F15%3A00083425" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/15:00083425 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ecargument.org/" target="_blank" >http://ecargument.org/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Strategic maneuvering quasi-logically : a case study of Perelman's probability

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper explores so-called quasi-logical arguments in terms of pragma-dialectics as a case of strategic maneuvering. These arguments exploit certain similarity with the mathematical or logical demonstrative character, on closer analysis, however, it isobvious that this similarity is only apparent. The paper is based on the pragma-dialectical reconstruction of probability, particular sub-type of quasi-logical arguments submitted in The New Rhetoric. It is demonstrated that this argument scheme presented in New Rhetoric as one type of scheme is possible to analyze as three different types of strategic maneuvering occurring in different stages of dialogue and using different aspect of strategic maneuvering.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Strategic maneuvering quasi-logically : a case study of Perelman's probability

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper explores so-called quasi-logical arguments in terms of pragma-dialectics as a case of strategic maneuvering. These arguments exploit certain similarity with the mathematical or logical demonstrative character, on closer analysis, however, it isobvious that this similarity is only apparent. The paper is based on the pragma-dialectical reconstruction of probability, particular sub-type of quasi-logical arguments submitted in The New Rhetoric. It is demonstrated that this argument scheme presented in New Rhetoric as one type of scheme is possible to analyze as three different types of strategic maneuvering occurring in different stages of dialogue and using different aspect of strategic maneuvering.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů