The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F17%3A00096312" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/17:00096312 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4468/4063" target="_blank" >http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4468/4063</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v37i1.4468" target="_blank" >10.22329/il.v37i1.4468</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article focuses on the New Rhetoric’s concept of quasi-logical arguments imitating logical or mathematical demonstrations, and examines it from point of view of pragma-dialectics as a device contributing towards resolving the difference of opinion. It is shown that the category of quasi-logical arguments cannot be considered as an argument scheme or a united type of strategic maneuvering. It is suggested to consider the category of quasi-logical arguments as a cluster of specific strategic maneuvers increasing the efficiency of arguments under certain circumstances. This approach is demonstrated in a case study of pragma-dialectical analysis of the quasi-logical scheme of probability.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Role of Quasi-Logical Arguments in Critical Dialogue: A Pragma-Dialectical Redefinition

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article focuses on the New Rhetoric’s concept of quasi-logical arguments imitating logical or mathematical demonstrations, and examines it from point of view of pragma-dialectics as a device contributing towards resolving the difference of opinion. It is shown that the category of quasi-logical arguments cannot be considered as an argument scheme or a united type of strategic maneuvering. It is suggested to consider the category of quasi-logical arguments as a cluster of specific strategic maneuvers increasing the efficiency of arguments under certain circumstances. This approach is demonstrated in a case study of pragma-dialectical analysis of the quasi-logical scheme of probability.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Informal Logic

ISSN

0824-2577

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CA - Kanada

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

42-69

Kód UT WoS článku

000397118100004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85015784674