Aristotelism in Czech structuralism : Jan Mukařovský and Otakar Zich

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F20%3A00114728" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/20:00114728 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142548" target="_blank" >http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/142548</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/TY2020-1-4" target="_blank" >10.5817/TY2020-1-4</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Aristotelism in Czech structuralism : Jan Mukařovský and Otakar Zich

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article tries to explain the differences between Zich's and Mukařovský's positions with regard to theory of the dramatic theatre due to their different affinities to the three traditions singled out from ancient Greek metaphysics by Jan Patočka. If Zich follows more the materialistic atomist Democritus, Mukařovský adheres more to Aristotle, whose realism holds the middle between atomism and Plato's idealism. As a result of their different philosophical inclinations, the two Czech structuralists interpret the relation between material and form differently. The article follows Mukařovský's gradual development of views focusing on the central ideas in his three main essays: 'Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts' (1936), 'On Poetic Language' (1940), and 'Intentionality and Unintentionality in Art' (1943). The aim of my article is therefore to draw attention to Mukařovský's study and specifically to his key idea of 'semantic gesture' especially in the dramatic genre in literature as well as in the theatre. In a brief sketch of Euripides' tragedy Medea I try to show how the dramatic dialogue lays bare conflicting ideas about social values in ancient Greek democracy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Aristotelism in Czech structuralism : Jan Mukařovský and Otakar Zich

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article tries to explain the differences between Zich's and Mukařovský's positions with regard to theory of the dramatic theatre due to their different affinities to the three traditions singled out from ancient Greek metaphysics by Jan Patočka. If Zich follows more the materialistic atomist Democritus, Mukařovský adheres more to Aristotle, whose realism holds the middle between atomism and Plato's idealism. As a result of their different philosophical inclinations, the two Czech structuralists interpret the relation between material and form differently. The article follows Mukařovský's gradual development of views focusing on the central ideas in his three main essays: 'Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts' (1936), 'On Poetic Language' (1940), and 'Intentionality and Unintentionality in Art' (1943). The aim of my article is therefore to draw attention to Mukařovský's study and specifically to his key idea of 'semantic gesture' especially in the dramatic genre in literature as well as in the theatre. In a brief sketch of Euripides' tragedy Medea I try to show how the dramatic dialogue lays bare conflicting ideas about social values in ancient Greek democracy.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60403 - Performing arts studies (Musicology, Theater science, Dramaturgy)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-20335S" target="_blank" >GA16-20335S: Divadlo jako syntéza uměni: Otakar Zich v kontextu moderní vědy a dnešní potenciál jeho konceptů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Theatralia

ISSN

1803-845X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

roč. 23

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

č. 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

44-53

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85090527726