Mark Antony and the Exile of Cicero : An attempt to Reconstruct the Political Strategy of the Young Antony and His Possible Involvement in Cicero’s Exile
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14210%2F24%3A00136304" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14210/24:00136304 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://athenaeum.unipv.it/" target="_blank" >https://athenaeum.unipv.it/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Mark Antony and the Exile of Cicero : An attempt to Reconstruct the Political Strategy of the Young Antony and His Possible Involvement in Cicero’s Exile
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In his Second Philippic, Cicero depicted the young Mark Antony as a morally corrupt man who had tried to take revenge on Cicero for the death of his stepfather Publius Cornelius Lentulus Sura. Cicero implied that Mark Antony had supported the tribune Publius Clodius Pulcher in the initiative that led to Cicero’s exile and the burning of his house. The present article analyses Cicero’s rhetorical strategy, as well as Mark Antony’s relations with certain contemporary figures; in this way, I attempt to interpret Mark Antony’s political strategy during the period. At the same time, my analysis shows that it is unlikely Mark Antony participated in the events leading to Cicero’s exile.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Mark Antony and the Exile of Cicero : An attempt to Reconstruct the Political Strategy of the Young Antony and His Possible Involvement in Cicero’s Exile
Popis výsledku anglicky
In his Second Philippic, Cicero depicted the young Mark Antony as a morally corrupt man who had tried to take revenge on Cicero for the death of his stepfather Publius Cornelius Lentulus Sura. Cicero implied that Mark Antony had supported the tribune Publius Clodius Pulcher in the initiative that led to Cicero’s exile and the burning of his house. The present article analyses Cicero’s rhetorical strategy, as well as Mark Antony’s relations with certain contemporary figures; in this way, I attempt to interpret Mark Antony’s political strategy during the period. At the same time, my analysis shows that it is unlikely Mark Antony participated in the events leading to Cicero’s exile.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Athenaeum : Studi di Letteratura e Storia dell’Antichita
ISSN
0004-6574
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
112
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
IT - Italská republika
Počet stran výsledku
26
Strana od-do
43-68
Kód UT WoS článku
001255084700003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85204112829