Argumentation 2011
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F11%3A00053409" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/11:00053409 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Argumentation 2011
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Argumentation, reasoning and justification have always been inherent parts of lawyers? work. Lawyers themselves are obviously well aware of the fact and would almost unanimously acknowledge that enhancing one?s knowledge and skills in argumentation has adirect impact on the quality of their work. The theoretical approach to the argumentation is usually concerned with the study of the nature and structure of arguments, development of models and frameworks of argumentation and assessment of ways to strengthen or attack arguments. The ambition of the conference is to establish a permanent platform to discuss and explore the alternative methods of legal argumentation, i.e. those that are not regularly employed in everyday legal practice, but would prove extremely valuable if adopted. It is thus our intention to bring new stimuli to both the approaches to the argumentation by showing that the outcomes of both are valuable and can be combined in coherent theories.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Argumentation 2011
Popis výsledku anglicky
Argumentation, reasoning and justification have always been inherent parts of lawyers? work. Lawyers themselves are obviously well aware of the fact and would almost unanimously acknowledge that enhancing one?s knowledge and skills in argumentation has adirect impact on the quality of their work. The theoretical approach to the argumentation is usually concerned with the study of the nature and structure of arguments, development of models and frameworks of argumentation and assessment of ways to strengthen or attack arguments. The ambition of the conference is to establish a permanent platform to discuss and explore the alternative methods of legal argumentation, i.e. those that are not regularly employed in everyday legal practice, but would prove extremely valuable if adopted. It is thus our intention to bring new stimuli to both the approaches to the argumentation by showing that the outcomes of both are valuable and can be combined in coherent theories.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
AG - Právní vědy
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů