Party appointed arbitrator in public international and international commercial arbitration: limits of independence and impartiality of arbitrato

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F12%3A00092660" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/12:00092660 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Party appointed arbitrator in public international and international commercial arbitration: limits of independence and impartiality of arbitrato

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Basic principle of the justice, is not only that the justice is done but also that the justice seemed to be done. This is the basis for the criticism of institute of the unilateral party appointed arbitrator in public international arbitration (not limited to the investment arbitration): and international commercial arbitration. However; this institute is widely used and there are no signs that this practice will change in hear future. The aim of this contribution is to compare the party appointed arbitrator in different types of arbitration - the public international law arbitration and the international commercial arbitration, and compare the objections to this institute in these types of arbitration. The comparison should allow looking for common ground's and possible solutions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Party appointed arbitrator in public international and international commercial arbitration: limits of independence and impartiality of arbitrato

Popis výsledku anglicky

Basic principle of the justice, is not only that the justice is done but also that the justice seemed to be done. This is the basis for the criticism of institute of the unilateral party appointed arbitrator in public international arbitration (not limited to the investment arbitration): and international commercial arbitration. However; this institute is widely used and there are no signs that this practice will change in hear future. The aim of this contribution is to compare the party appointed arbitrator in different types of arbitration - the public international law arbitration and the international commercial arbitration, and compare the objections to this institute in these types of arbitration. The comparison should allow looking for common ground's and possible solutions.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

International Conference on the Limits of Law / Limity práva

ISBN

9788087576458

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

174-183

Název nakladatele

Leges

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Olomouc

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2012

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000339362000020