How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee – Suggested Practice

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F16%3A00087796" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/16:00087796 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.greynet.org/images/Contents_-_Special_Winter_Issue,_TGJ_Vol.12,_2016.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.greynet.org/images/Contents_-_Special_Winter_Issue,_TGJ_Vol.12,_2016.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee – Suggested Practice

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Each research institution that operates a repository has to make a decision whether to allow all its employees to upload their own works (the liberal model) or whether to create a special organizational unit that will review and approve each file shared via repository. This dilemma is accompanied with another important decision that an institution needs to make. Should the institution let its researchers to freely license their works to whichever publisher they choose, or should it apply a managing approach to publication activities? The post will outline legal challenges of both approaches and will formulate practical recommendations, how to formulate internal institutional norms that regulate the institutional repository.

Název v anglickém jazyce

How to Divide the Responsibility for a Repository Between Employer and Employee – Suggested Practice

Popis výsledku anglicky

Each research institution that operates a repository has to make a decision whether to allow all its employees to upload their own works (the liberal model) or whether to create a special organizational unit that will review and approve each file shared via repository. This dilemma is accompanied with another important decision that an institution needs to make. Should the institution let its researchers to freely license their works to whichever publisher they choose, or should it apply a managing approach to publication activities? The post will outline legal challenges of both approaches and will formulate practical recommendations, how to formulate internal institutional norms that regulate the institutional repository.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA15-20763S" target="_blank" >GA15-20763S: Právni rámec sběru, zpracování, uchovávání a užívání výzkumných dat</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Grey Journal

ISSN

1574-180X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2016

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

70-73

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—