Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F19%3A00109577" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/19:00109577 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455" target="_blank" >http://uprava.fu.uni-lj.si/index.php/CEPAR/article/view/412/455</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03" target="_blank" >10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection again-st administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrati-ve silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especi-ally the length of proceedings) dealing with the so-called inactivity. The methods of analysis applied are normative analysis, literature review, sta-tistical analysis of decision-making activities of courts and deduction. Our findings establish that due to the excessive length of court proceedings and incomprehensible legal regulation it is difficult to view the judicial protection against administrative silence as being a speedy and effecti-ve instrument of remediation of inactivity on the part of administrative authorities. The results can serve as a ground to compare the situation with other similar countries and to exchange best practices.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection again-st administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrati-ve silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especi-ally the length of proceedings) dealing with the so-called inactivity. The methods of analysis applied are normative analysis, literature review, sta-tistical analysis of decision-making activities of courts and deduction. Our findings establish that due to the excessive length of court proceedings and incomprehensible legal regulation it is difficult to view the judicial protection against administrative silence as being a speedy and effecti-ve instrument of remediation of inactivity on the part of administrative authorities. The results can serve as a ground to compare the situation with other similar countries and to exchange best practices.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Central European Public Administration Review

ISSN

2591-2240

e-ISSN

2591-2259

Svazek periodika

17

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

SI - Slovinská republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

43-68

Kód UT WoS článku

000465547300003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—