Fingerprint forgery training: Easy to learn, hard to perform
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14330%2F23%3A00131644" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14330/23:00131644 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3604990" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3604990</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3604990" target="_blank" >10.1145/3600160.3604990</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Fingerprint forgery training: Easy to learn, hard to perform
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Many services offer fingerprint authentication, including sensitive services such as mobile banking. This broad adoption could make an impression to the end-users that fingerprint authentication is secure. However, fingerprint authentication is vulnerable to various attacks performed even by not-very-sophisticated attackers, e.g., fingerprint forgery. Will participants perceive fingerprint authentication differently after relevant theory education and the creation of their fingerprint counterfeit to overcome misunderstandings, especially regarding security? How will they perceive the fingerprint forgery process? We prepared a hands-on seminar with fingerprint forgery simulation. We focused on the difference in perception before and after the theoretical lecture on biometrics and a practical seminar on forgery creation. We applied an uncommon approach, reconstructing the fingerprint from a photo of the actual finger rather than its print on some surface – to illustrate the case of an attack based merely on a “thumb-up” photograph. Our results show that 19% of participants (out of 221) were successful in spoofing, according to the NIST Biometric Image Software, and 27% of participants could register their counterfeit into the smartphone. Participants perceived fingerprint authentication as less secure after the simulation and reported their intention to use it less for mobile banking operations. They also perceived the forgery attack as easier to learn than before the simulation – but harder to perform. Our study implies that participants intend to change their behaviour based on their experience from our seminar, however, they did not consider two-factor authentication as an option.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Fingerprint forgery training: Easy to learn, hard to perform
Popis výsledku anglicky
Many services offer fingerprint authentication, including sensitive services such as mobile banking. This broad adoption could make an impression to the end-users that fingerprint authentication is secure. However, fingerprint authentication is vulnerable to various attacks performed even by not-very-sophisticated attackers, e.g., fingerprint forgery. Will participants perceive fingerprint authentication differently after relevant theory education and the creation of their fingerprint counterfeit to overcome misunderstandings, especially regarding security? How will they perceive the fingerprint forgery process? We prepared a hands-on seminar with fingerprint forgery simulation. We focused on the difference in perception before and after the theoretical lecture on biometrics and a practical seminar on forgery creation. We applied an uncommon approach, reconstructing the fingerprint from a photo of the actual finger rather than its print on some surface – to illustrate the case of an attack based merely on a “thumb-up” photograph. Our results show that 19% of participants (out of 221) were successful in spoofing, according to the NIST Biometric Image Software, and 27% of participants could register their counterfeit into the smartphone. Participants perceived fingerprint authentication as less secure after the simulation and reported their intention to use it less for mobile banking operations. They also perceived the forgery attack as easier to learn than before the simulation – but harder to perform. Our study implies that participants intend to change their behaviour based on their experience from our seminar, however, they did not consider two-factor authentication as an option.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10200 - Computer and information sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
ISBN
9798400707728
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
1307-1313
Název nakladatele
Association for Computing Machinery
Místo vydání
Benevento, Italy
Místo konání akce
Benevento, Italy
Datum konání akce
1. 1. 2023
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
001122662500136