Turn-taking management during cross-examination: Lay people as cross-examiners

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F08%3A00032743" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/08:00032743 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Turn-taking management during cross-examination: Lay people as cross-examiners

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper compares the turn-taking management (i.e. simultaneous speech, interruptions, third turns) of two self-represented litigants with the turn-taking management a professional lawyer. The data are drawn from the libel case McDonald's corporation v.H. Steel and D. Morris, which was tried in Great Britain. Turn-taking in Steel and Morris's cross-examination parts is similar to the conversational turn-taking due to frequent overlaps and follow-ups that are sometimes too supportive and not challenging enough. In contrast to the self-represented litigants, the professional lawyer preserves the pre-allocated character of cross-examination turn-taking (i.e. turn order and distribution of turns). As a result, his cross-examination is more orderly and professional.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Turn-taking management during cross-examination: Lay people as cross-examiners

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper compares the turn-taking management (i.e. simultaneous speech, interruptions, third turns) of two self-represented litigants with the turn-taking management a professional lawyer. The data are drawn from the libel case McDonald's corporation v.H. Steel and D. Morris, which was tried in Great Britain. Turn-taking in Steel and Morris's cross-examination parts is similar to the conversational turn-taking due to frequent overlaps and follow-ups that are sometimes too supportive and not challenging enough. In contrast to the self-represented litigants, the professional lawyer preserves the pre-allocated character of cross-examination turn-taking (i.e. turn order and distribution of turns). As a result, his cross-examination is more orderly and professional.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AI - Jazykověda

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2008

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Topics in Linguistics. Politeness and Interaction.

ISBN

—

ISSN

1337-7590

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

Constantine the Philosopher University

Místo vydání

Nitra

Místo konání akce

Nitra

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2007

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—