Cross-Examination Questioning: Lay People as Cross-Examiners

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F10%3A00043496" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/10:00043496 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—

Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Cross-Examination Questioning: Lay People as Cross-Examiners
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study deals with a quantitative analysis of cross-examination questions and a qualitative analysis of cross-examination strategies. The cross-examination questioning of a highly experienced counsel is contrasted with the cross-examination style of two pro se litigants who represent themselves in court. The data are drawn from a libel case McDonalds Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris. The author comes to the conclusion that the pro se litigants develop in inter-genre during the court proceedings and learn from the counsel to use more coercive questions. But their development remains unstable.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Cross-Examination Questioning: Lay People as Cross-Examiners
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study deals with a quantitative analysis of cross-examination questions and a qualitative analysis of cross-examination strategies. The cross-examination questioning of a highly experienced counsel is contrasted with the cross-examination style of two pro se litigants who represent themselves in court. The data are drawn from a libel case McDonalds Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris. The author comes to the conclusion that the pro se litigants develop in inter-genre during the court proceedings and learn from the counsel to use more coercive questions. But their development remains unstable.

Rok uplatnění
2010
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Podobné výsledky(10)