Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F18%3A00101172" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/18:00101172 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://benjamins.com/catalog/dapsac.79.11don" target="_blank" >https://benjamins.com/catalog/dapsac.79.11don</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.11don" target="_blank" >10.1075/dapsac.79.11don</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This chapter studies persuasion in academic book reviews from a cross-cultural perspective. After discussing the rhetorical structure of book reviews, the study explores the strategic means used by the authors of reviews to represent themselves as expert members of the disciplinary community, show authorial involvement, and open a dialogic space for the negotiation of their opinions and views. The analysis of citation practices, personal structures, and evaluation acts is carried out on a corpus of book reviews published in the linguistics journals Journal of English for Academic Purposes and Slovo a Slovesnost. The findings indicate that while both Anglophone and Czech linguists exploit these linguistic means for persuasive purposes, there is cross-cultural variation in their rate of occurrence and rhetorical functions.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews
Popis výsledku anglicky
This chapter studies persuasion in academic book reviews from a cross-cultural perspective. After discussing the rhetorical structure of book reviews, the study explores the strategic means used by the authors of reviews to represent themselves as expert members of the disciplinary community, show authorial involvement, and open a dialogic space for the negotiation of their opinions and views. The analysis of citation practices, personal structures, and evaluation acts is carried out on a corpus of book reviews published in the linguistics journals Journal of English for Academic Purposes and Slovo a Slovesnost. The findings indicate that while both Anglophone and Czech linguists exploit these linguistic means for persuasive purposes, there is cross-cultural variation in their rate of occurrence and rhetorical functions.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA17-16195S" target="_blank" >GA17-16195S: Persvaze v anglickém a českém specializovaném diskurzu</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives
ISBN
9789027201386
Počet stran výsledku
31
Strana od-do
227-257
Počet stran knihy
335
Název nakladatele
John Benjamins
Místo vydání
Amsterdam/Philadelphia
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—