Modernism and Nihilism of the Constitution for the Earth

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14410%2F19%3A00109971" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14410/19:00109971 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/ebce/9/1-2/article-p57.xml" target="_blank" >https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/ebce/9/1-2/article-p57.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2019-0005" target="_blank" >10.2478/ebce-2019-0005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Modernism and Nihilism of the Constitution for the Earth

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article uses the post-modern Nietzsche affirmation as a criterion for the analysis of the philosophical concept of the Constitution for the Earth (ŠMAJS, J., 2015) and other texts by Josef Šmajs, the principal author of the theory of evolutionary ontology. The author draws the attention of the group of authors of the Constitution for the Earth to the risk of the modernist and nihilist application of evolutionary ontology and proposes that the theory be extended to include new criteria and methods to enable it to be applied in a more acceptable manner. The author places efforts aimed at the biophilic transformation of culture into the value-based and ethical framework of moderate anthropocentrism instead of the ecocentric approach preferred by the creators of evolutionary ontology. The author also underlines the risk of the application of an ecocentric approach through the application of recent analysis of the media presentations of those who support and deny climate change in the work entitled Environmental Ethics and Behavioural Change (FRANKS, B. – HANSCOMB, S. &amp; JOHNSTON, S., 2018 ).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Modernism and Nihilism of the Constitution for the Earth

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article uses the post-modern Nietzsche affirmation as a criterion for the analysis of the philosophical concept of the Constitution for the Earth (ŠMAJS, J., 2015) and other texts by Josef Šmajs, the principal author of the theory of evolutionary ontology. The author draws the attention of the group of authors of the Constitution for the Earth to the risk of the modernist and nihilist application of evolutionary ontology and proposes that the theory be extended to include new criteria and methods to enable it to be applied in a more acceptable manner. The author places efforts aimed at the biophilic transformation of culture into the value-based and ethical framework of moderate anthropocentrism instead of the ecocentric approach preferred by the creators of evolutionary ontology. The author also underlines the risk of the application of an ecocentric approach through the application of recent analysis of the media presentations of those who support and deny climate change in the work entitled Environmental Ethics and Behavioural Change (FRANKS, B. – HANSCOMB, S. &amp; JOHNSTON, S., 2018 ).

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe)

ISSN

1338-5615

e-ISSN

2453-7829

Svazek periodika

9

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1-2

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

57-63

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85067459136