Reluctant Reforms: The Case of Kazakhstan

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14560%2F12%3A00067040" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14560/12:00067040 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/983/art%253A10.1007%252Fs11115-012-0210-y.pdf?auth66=1396454137_5d5ae6a89fdc8471f2aa25c7da883246&ext=.pdf" target="_blank" >http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/983/art%253A10.1007%252Fs11115-012-0210-y.pdf?auth66=1396454137_5d5ae6a89fdc8471f2aa25c7da883246&ext=.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0210-y" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11115-012-0210-y</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reluctant Reforms: The Case of Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper investigates what happens during reluctant reforms in which normative imperatives conflict with self-interest. In the literature one of the expected outcomes is hypocrisy. However, the claim of hypocrisy is a strong one and needs backing. Thepurpose of this paper is to investigate on the basis of which indicators such claims can be warranted and whether these indicators are found in the case of reforms in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The common thread in the literature about hypocrisy is thepoint of inconsistency. Inconsistency in two ways: in the case of reforms to claim to induce huge changes, while resulting in nominal reforms, not changing anything; and inconsistency in the reactions to and opinions about such changes showing 'differential judgments according to contexts'. This is investigated for the reforms in Kazakhstan with regard to promoting democracy and protecting human rights during the last decade.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reluctant Reforms: The Case of Kazakhstan

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper investigates what happens during reluctant reforms in which normative imperatives conflict with self-interest. In the literature one of the expected outcomes is hypocrisy. However, the claim of hypocrisy is a strong one and needs backing. Thepurpose of this paper is to investigate on the basis of which indicators such claims can be warranted and whether these indicators are found in the case of reforms in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The common thread in the literature about hypocrisy is thepoint of inconsistency. Inconsistency in two ways: in the case of reforms to claim to induce huge changes, while resulting in nominal reforms, not changing anything; and inconsistency in the reactions to and opinions about such changes showing 'differential judgments according to contexts'. This is investigated for the reforms in Kazakhstan with regard to promoting democracy and protecting human rights during the last decade.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP403%2F12%2F0366" target="_blank" >GAP403/12/0366: Identifikace a evaluace regionálně specifických faktorů úspěšnosti reforem v duchu NPM ? země CEE</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Public Organization Review

ISSN

1566-7170

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

Neuveden

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

11

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

1-19

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—