Performance and Quality Comparison of Movie Alignment Software for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14610%2F23%3A00136930" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14610/23:00136930 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/10/1835" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/10/1835</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14101835" target="_blank" >10.3390/mi14101835</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Performance and Quality Comparison of Movie Alignment Software for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) has been established as one of the key players in structural biology. It can reconstruct a 3D model of a sample at a near-atomic resolution. With the increasing number of facilities, faster microscopes, and new imaging techniques, there is a growing demand for algorithms and programs able to process the so-called movie data produced by the microscopes in real time while preserving a high resolution and maximal information. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of the quality and performance of the most commonly used software for movie alignment. More precisely, we compare the most recent versions of FlexAlign (Xmipp v3.23.03), MotionCor2 (v1.6.4), Relion MotionCor (v4.0-beta), Warp (v1.0.9), and CryoSPARC (v4.0.3). We tested the quality of the alignment using generated phantom data, as well as real datasets, comparing the alignment precision, power spectra density, and performance scaling of each program.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Performance and Quality Comparison of Movie Alignment Software for Cryogenic Electron Microscopy

Popis výsledku anglicky

Cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) has been established as one of the key players in structural biology. It can reconstruct a 3D model of a sample at a near-atomic resolution. With the increasing number of facilities, faster microscopes, and new imaging techniques, there is a growing demand for algorithms and programs able to process the so-called movie data produced by the microscopes in real time while preserving a high resolution and maximal information. In this article, we conduct a comparative analysis of the quality and performance of the most commonly used software for movie alignment. More precisely, we compare the most recent versions of FlexAlign (Xmipp v3.23.03), MotionCor2 (v1.6.4), Relion MotionCor (v4.0-beta), Warp (v1.0.9), and CryoSPARC (v4.0.3). We tested the quality of the alignment using generated phantom data, as well as real datasets, comparing the alignment precision, power spectra density, and performance scaling of each program.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10406 - Analytical chemistry

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

IEEJ Transactions on Sensors and Micromachines

ISSN

2072-666X

e-ISSN

2072-666X

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

1-24

Kód UT WoS článku

001095235000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85175065572