Conversational Machinations

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F22%3A39919536" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/22:39919536 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-98084-9_16" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-98084-9_16</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98084-9_16" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-98084-9_16</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conversational Machinations

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this chapter, I am discussing the issue of assigning thought to AI entities. Using the example of Sophia the Robot, I try to show that “assigning thought” to an AI entity is less a statement made based on an empirical inquiry, and more the matter of a complex attitude relying on the assigning person’s conceptual sensitivity and imagination. In that respect, most AIs fail simply because people lack the right kind of conceptual resources for relating to them as to persons “speaking out of a life”. However, in the second part I am showing that Sophia represents a case of a coordinated and intentional attempt at shifting our conceptual intuitions, by means of creating and curating conversation situations in such a way that people can relate to “her” as to a genuine person and speaker. Toward the end, I mention a few aspects of this practice that appear morally problematic in a more straightforward sense.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conversational Machinations

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this chapter, I am discussing the issue of assigning thought to AI entities. Using the example of Sophia the Robot, I try to show that “assigning thought” to an AI entity is less a statement made based on an empirical inquiry, and more the matter of a complex attitude relying on the assigning person’s conceptual sensitivity and imagination. In that respect, most AIs fail simply because people lack the right kind of conceptual resources for relating to them as to persons “speaking out of a life”. However, in the second part I am showing that Sophia represents a case of a coordinated and intentional attempt at shifting our conceptual intuitions, by means of creating and curating conversation situations in such a way that people can relate to “her” as to a genuine person and speaker. Toward the end, I mention a few aspects of this practice that appear morally problematic in a more straightforward sense.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF15_003%2F0000425" target="_blank" >EF15_003/0000425: Centrum pro etiku</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Ethical Inquiries after Wittgenstein

ISBN

978-3-030-98083-2

Počet stran výsledku

18

Strana od-do

255-272

Počet stran knihy

278

Název nakladatele

Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Místo vydání

Cham

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—