"Experto crede" : Patient knowledge formation in health communities on Facebook
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F24%3A39922487" target="_blank" >RIV/00216275:25210/24:39922487 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00172.szc" target="_blank" >https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00172.szc</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ld.00172.szc" target="_blank" >10.1075/ld.00172.szc</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
"Experto crede" : Patient knowledge formation in health communities on Facebook
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article explains the processes involved in knowledge sharing and support giving in an open FB forum dedicated to endometriosis. It builds on the existing understanding of experiential knowledge, as well as adopts Jovchelovitch’s (2007) perspective on knowledge diversity and representation which views knowledge construction as an intersubjective process. The analysis looks at the what, the who, and the how of the community in question, focusing in particular on three areas: identity work (self- and other-categorisation); perspective sharing and recognition by “significant others”; and epistemic self-other positioning. The analysis determines the most common strategies of categorisation, identifies ways of constructing shared understanding, as well as reveals that the participants’ personal truths are based primarily on their embodied experience and hearsay.
Název v anglickém jazyce
"Experto crede" : Patient knowledge formation in health communities on Facebook
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article explains the processes involved in knowledge sharing and support giving in an open FB forum dedicated to endometriosis. It builds on the existing understanding of experiential knowledge, as well as adopts Jovchelovitch’s (2007) perspective on knowledge diversity and representation which views knowledge construction as an intersubjective process. The analysis looks at the what, the who, and the how of the community in question, focusing in particular on three areas: identity work (self- and other-categorisation); perspective sharing and recognition by “significant others”; and epistemic self-other positioning. The analysis determines the most common strategies of categorisation, identifies ways of constructing shared understanding, as well as reveals that the participants’ personal truths are based primarily on their embodied experience and hearsay.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60203 - Linguistics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Language and Dialogue
ISSN
2210-4119
e-ISSN
2210-4127
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
29
Strana od-do
268-296
Kód UT WoS článku
001288088000002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—