Pad Alignment Methods and Their Impact on Large Hydrostatic Bearing Precision
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26210%2F24%3APU151873" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26210/24:PU151873 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/12/8/549" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/12/8/549</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/machines12080549" target="_blank" >10.3390/machines12080549</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Pad Alignment Methods and Their Impact on Large Hydrostatic Bearing Precision
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Hydrostatic bearings are frequently used for moving large structures smoothly and precisely. In such applications, difficulties with manufacturing, transportation, and assembly arise. The safety and precision of the entire supported structure depend on the accuracy of the hydrostatic bearing alignment. There are several suitable methods for its alignment, yet it is not clear which method can achieve the highest bearing precision. This study provides a comparative experimental assessment of the three methods. The measurements were performed on a hydrostatic bearing test rig with independent positioning of the pads. Conventional measuring devices, a pressure distribution alignment method, and an optical method, OCMM (optical coordinate measuring machine), were compared. The accuracy of the selected methods and the difficulty of the aligning process were included in the comparison. The OCMM method was able to achieve an accuracy 1.6 times higher relative to the pressure method and 6 times higher compared to conventional measuring devices. This method is versatile and can be applied for a wide range of bearing sizes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Pad Alignment Methods and Their Impact on Large Hydrostatic Bearing Precision
Popis výsledku anglicky
Hydrostatic bearings are frequently used for moving large structures smoothly and precisely. In such applications, difficulties with manufacturing, transportation, and assembly arise. The safety and precision of the entire supported structure depend on the accuracy of the hydrostatic bearing alignment. There are several suitable methods for its alignment, yet it is not clear which method can achieve the highest bearing precision. This study provides a comparative experimental assessment of the three methods. The measurements were performed on a hydrostatic bearing test rig with independent positioning of the pads. Conventional measuring devices, a pressure distribution alignment method, and an optical method, OCMM (optical coordinate measuring machine), were compared. The accuracy of the selected methods and the difficulty of the aligning process were included in the comparison. The OCMM method was able to achieve an accuracy 1.6 times higher relative to the pressure method and 6 times higher compared to conventional measuring devices. This method is versatile and can be applied for a wide range of bearing sizes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20301 - Mechanical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/FW03010357" target="_blank" >FW03010357: Výzkum a vývoj hydrostatického pohonu a uložení točny na bázi adaptivních regulačních smyček</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Machines
ISSN
2075-1702
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
8
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
„“-„“
Kód UT WoS článku
001304661600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85202620170