Comparative Survey of Image Compression Methods Across Different Pixel Formats and Bit Depths
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26230%2F26%3A0198412" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26230/26:0198412 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11760-025-04579-6" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11760-025-04579-6</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11760-025-04579-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11760-025-04579-6</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparative Survey of Image Compression Methods Across Different Pixel Formats and Bit Depths
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Image compression is essential to reduce memory requirements while maintaining a good visual quality of images. The size of raw data of a commonly used RGB 8-bit 4K image would be almost 25 MB, which is too large for efficient streaming, storing and processing. This paper mainly evaluates and compares the state-of-the-art lossy image compression methods. The survey of existing studies is supplemented by an experimental evaluation. The main contribution of this research is the comprehensive comparison taking into account different pixel formats. Modern video compression methods are also used, as they can compress a single image too. Real-life photos are compressed using existing encoders, and visual quality, compression ratio, and encoding speed are evaluated using several metrics. The novel video encoding VVC outperforms other methods in most of the cases. WebP seems to be a viable choice when video encoding is not an option. VVC, AV1, and XVC show very close results with H.265 slightly behind them. The computational complexity of VVC might be problematic when fast processing is necessary, and the other formats might be better options. The paper presents detailed results regarding visual quality, storage requirements, computational time, differences between the compression artifacts and pixel formats, etc.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparative Survey of Image Compression Methods Across Different Pixel Formats and Bit Depths
Popis výsledku anglicky
Image compression is essential to reduce memory requirements while maintaining a good visual quality of images. The size of raw data of a commonly used RGB 8-bit 4K image would be almost 25 MB, which is too large for efficient streaming, storing and processing. This paper mainly evaluates and compares the state-of-the-art lossy image compression methods. The survey of existing studies is supplemented by an experimental evaluation. The main contribution of this research is the comprehensive comparison taking into account different pixel formats. Modern video compression methods are also used, as they can compress a single image too. Real-life photos are compressed using existing encoders, and visual quality, compression ratio, and encoding speed are evaluated using several metrics. The novel video encoding VVC outperforms other methods in most of the cases. WebP seems to be a viable choice when video encoding is not an option. VVC, AV1, and XVC show very close results with H.265 slightly behind them. The computational complexity of VVC might be problematic when fast processing is necessary, and the other formats might be better options. The paper presents detailed results regarding visual quality, storage requirements, computational time, differences between the compression artifacts and pixel formats, etc.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Signal Image and Video Processing
ISSN
1863-1703
e-ISSN
1863-1711
Svazek periodika
19
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
12
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
0-0
Kód UT WoS článku
001567113700044
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105015101321