Analysis of Methods for the Evaluation of Information Systems: Critical Comparison by Selected Criteria

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216305%3A26510%2F15%3APU116548" target="_blank" >RIV/00216305:26510/15:PU116548 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Analysis of Methods for the Evaluation of Information Systems: Critical Comparison by Selected Criteria

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The purpose of the paper is to outline the benefits and drawbacks of selected methods which can be used for the evaluation of information systems. One of the main reasons for the evaluation of information systems is to receive feedback and adopt measuresbased on results. Although there is a lot of foreign literature in this area, there are still differences in the usage of research results. In this article I compared the methods according to the following six criteria: method, number of phases/criteria, information system life cycle phase, output, the possibility of comparing results of effectiveness, primary focus of the method. For the analysis, which is the subject of my work, I have chosen four scientific articles - four different approaches thathave been published since 2011. This article contains detailed descriptions, benefits, drawbacks and comparison of chosen methods. The primary aim is to analyze chosen methods, which can be used for the evaluation of information systems.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Analysis of Methods for the Evaluation of Information Systems: Critical Comparison by Selected Criteria

Popis výsledku anglicky

The purpose of the paper is to outline the benefits and drawbacks of selected methods which can be used for the evaluation of information systems. One of the main reasons for the evaluation of information systems is to receive feedback and adopt measuresbased on results. Although there is a lot of foreign literature in this area, there are still differences in the usage of research results. In this article I compared the methods according to the following six criteria: method, number of phases/criteria, information system life cycle phase, output, the possibility of comparing results of effectiveness, primary focus of the method. For the analysis, which is the subject of my work, I have chosen four scientific articles - four different approaches thathave been published since 2011. This article contains detailed descriptions, benefits, drawbacks and comparison of chosen methods. The primary aim is to analyze chosen methods, which can be used for the evaluation of information systems.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

IBIMA

ISBN

978-0-9860419-5-2

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1-9

Název nakladatele

IBIMA

Místo vydání

Madrid, Spain

Místo konání akce

Madrid

Datum konání akce

11. 11. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000366872700063