European standards for quality assurance and institutional practices of student assessment in the UK, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00237752%3A_____%2F14%3A%230000195" target="_blank" >RIV/00237752:_____/14:#0000195 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00237752:_____/14:#0000211

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.830694" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.830694</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.830694" target="_blank" >10.1080/02602938.2013.830694</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

European standards for quality assurance and institutional practices of student assessment in the UK, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article analyses the student assessment procedures of 12 universities in the UK, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic with respect to their alignment with the European standards and guidelines on the quality of assessing higher education students(European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance [ESG] 1.3). Based on qualitative methodology combining document review with semi-structured interviews, the analysis has yielded three major results. First, the assessment procedures of the UK universities studied indicate the highest alignment with the ESG 1.3 when compared to the Czech institutions, with the Dutch universities occupying the middle ground. Second, a preference for summative assessment to account for pressures of massification canbe observed at institutions in all three countries. Third, it is argued that contrary to some (ministerial) expectations, the influence of the ESG on institutions seems to be insignificant, due to unawareness of the ESG 1.3 at all of the

Název v anglickém jazyce

European standards for quality assurance and institutional practices of student assessment in the UK, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article analyses the student assessment procedures of 12 universities in the UK, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic with respect to their alignment with the European standards and guidelines on the quality of assessing higher education students(European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance [ESG] 1.3). Based on qualitative methodology combining document review with semi-structured interviews, the analysis has yielded three major results. First, the assessment procedures of the UK universities studied indicate the highest alignment with the ESG 1.3 when compared to the Czech institutions, with the Dutch universities occupying the middle ground. Second, a preference for summative assessment to account for pressures of massification canbe observed at institutions in all three countries. Third, it is argued that contrary to some (ministerial) expectations, the influence of the ESG on institutions seems to be insignificant, due to unawareness of the ESG 1.3 at all of the

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AM - Pedagogika a školství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education

ISSN

0260-2938

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

310-325

Kód UT WoS článku

000331356300004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—