Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Rating road safety performance of Czech regions using composite indicators

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F44994575%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000038" target="_blank" >RIV/44994575:_____/18:N0000038 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97882551864111" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97882551864111</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97882551864111" target="_blank" >10.4399/97882551864111</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Rating road safety performance of Czech regions using composite indicators

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Road safety performance may be rated using socio-economic losses from traffic accidents. However, each relative indicator has its advantages and challenges, which complicates their choice and use. In order to obtain overall ranking of each region of country in terms of road safety performance and learn from the others, it is beneficial to compare them by using objective methods, based on composite indicators, i.e. combinations of several individual indicators. In this context, four approaches to obtain weights for subsequent determining of composite indicators were developed, based on statistical models and compilations of individual indicators, using data on 2014 socio-economic losses in 13 regions of Czech Republic. Composite indicators were developed using principal component analysis, factor analysis, rank-sum ratio method and data envelopment analysis, as used for example in economy or social sciences. The final results were determined as a combination of rankings based on the composite indicators. For additional interpretation comparative examples of regional ranking using selected social and behavioural indicators (unemployment, crime rate, using mobile phones while driving) were also listed. In the end, the study enabled ranking Czech regions according to their safety performance. The final regional comparison may be used for objective assessment of road safety impacts and countermeasure proposals.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Rating road safety performance of Czech regions using composite indicators

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Road safety performance may be rated using socio-economic losses from traffic accidents. However, each relative indicator has its advantages and challenges, which complicates their choice and use. In order to obtain overall ranking of each region of country in terms of road safety performance and learn from the others, it is beneficial to compare them by using objective methods, based on composite indicators, i.e. combinations of several individual indicators. In this context, four approaches to obtain weights for subsequent determining of composite indicators were developed, based on statistical models and compilations of individual indicators, using data on 2014 socio-economic losses in 13 regions of Czech Republic. Composite indicators were developed using principal component analysis, factor analysis, rank-sum ratio method and data envelopment analysis, as used for example in economy or social sciences. The final results were determined as a combination of rankings based on the composite indicators. For additional interpretation comparative examples of regional ranking using selected social and behavioural indicators (unemployment, crime rate, using mobile phones while driving) were also listed. In the end, the study enabled ranking Czech regions according to their safety performance. The final regional comparison may be used for objective assessment of road safety impacts and countermeasure proposals.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20104 - Transport engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Advances in Transportation Studies

  • ISSN

    1824-5463

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    46

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    IT - Italská republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    153-162

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85054737132