Group Decision Making in Ordinal Consensus Ranking Problem

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F10%3A%230000455" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/10:#0000455 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Group Decision Making in Ordinal Consensus Ranking Problem

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The problem of achieving overall consensus on a set of rankings has been studied for more than two centuries and concerns many disciplines: management science, marketing, social science, politics, psychology, etc. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the following methods of group decision making in ordinal consensus ranking problem: method of Kendall and Borda (BAK), maximize heuristic agreement procedure (MAH) by Beck and Lin, consensus ranking model (CRM) by Cook and Kress, hybrid distance-basedmodel (DCM) by Tavana et al., Kendall´s and Spearman´s footrule distance, Kemeny-Snell distance and a fuzzy model by Blin and Whinston. Use of these techniques is demonstrated in an example - selection of a football stadium project from four alternatives by eight decision makers. The latter part of the article includes comparison of these methods and some generalizations for problems with different weights of individual rankings or problems with ties, etc.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Group Decision Making in Ordinal Consensus Ranking Problem

Popis výsledku anglicky

The problem of achieving overall consensus on a set of rankings has been studied for more than two centuries and concerns many disciplines: management science, marketing, social science, politics, psychology, etc. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the following methods of group decision making in ordinal consensus ranking problem: method of Kendall and Borda (BAK), maximize heuristic agreement procedure (MAH) by Beck and Lin, consensus ranking model (CRM) by Cook and Kress, hybrid distance-basedmodel (DCM) by Tavana et al., Kendall´s and Spearman´s footrule distance, Kemeny-Snell distance and a fuzzy model by Blin and Whinston. Use of these techniques is demonstrated in an example - selection of a football stadium project from four alternatives by eight decision makers. The latter part of the article includes comparison of these methods and some generalizations for problems with different weights of individual rankings or problems with ties, etc.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2010

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Mathematical Methods in Economics 2010

ISBN

978-80-7394-218-2

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

Jihočeská Univerzita v Českých Budějovicích

Místo vydání

České Budějovice

Místo konání akce

České Budějovice

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2010

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

BTS47