The Law of Demand and the Loss of Confidence Effect: An Experimental Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F47813059%3A19520%2F19%3AA0000057" target="_blank" >RIV/47813059:19520/19:A0000057 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844019363455" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844019363455</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02685" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02685</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Law of Demand and the Loss of Confidence Effect: An Experimental Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this article is to examine the possibility that a market demand function (curve) might not be monotonically decreasing in its entire domain according to the consumer theory neoclassical as assumed by the law of demand (for normal goods). This may happen due to limited rationality of (some) consumers and the anchor price effect. When a price of a good decreases to some point, the amount demanded might stops increasing due to the loss of confidence effect: consumers’ unwillingness to buy a too cheap product. The existence of this effect was examined via questionnaire on a sample of 377 undergraduate university students from the Czech Republic, Ecuador and Spain. The main result of this experimental study is that the loss of confidence effect appeared at all three locations, which indicates that the law of demand may not be valid in its entire domain. Furthermore, the results of this study imply that a significant percentage of people make decisions of limited rationality even when facing a very simple task. In addition, statistically significant difference in rational behavior with respect to gender was found.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Law of Demand and the Loss of Confidence Effect: An Experimental Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this article is to examine the possibility that a market demand function (curve) might not be monotonically decreasing in its entire domain according to the consumer theory neoclassical as assumed by the law of demand (for normal goods). This may happen due to limited rationality of (some) consumers and the anchor price effect. When a price of a good decreases to some point, the amount demanded might stops increasing due to the loss of confidence effect: consumers’ unwillingness to buy a too cheap product. The existence of this effect was examined via questionnaire on a sample of 377 undergraduate university students from the Czech Republic, Ecuador and Spain. The main result of this experimental study is that the loss of confidence effect appeared at all three locations, which indicates that the law of demand may not be valid in its entire domain. Furthermore, the results of this study imply that a significant percentage of people make decisions of limited rationality even when facing a very simple task. In addition, statistically significant difference in rational behavior with respect to gender was found.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50201 - Economic Theory
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Heliyon
ISSN
2405-8440
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
5
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
11
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
1-6
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85074132994