Reliability Requirements Allocation for Combat Vehicle Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60162694%3AG43__%2F13%3A00494120" target="_blank" >RIV/60162694:G43__/13:00494120 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr" target="_blank" >http://vavtest.unob.cz/registr</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reliability Requirements Allocation for Combat Vehicle Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The rational apportionment of system reliability requirements among its items is a complex issue within the reliability allocation process. Equal apportionment is the simplest way to allocate requirements but it is not objective approach. Weighted apportionment that takes into account importance/weight of system items is more rational approach to allocate reliability requirements. Importance/weight of system item is usually determined using selected criteria. The determination of items importance in system structure with respect to the criteria might be construed as a matter of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The paper offers the utilization of MCDM methods as a powerful tool for evaluating system items importance with the goal to achieve optimal allocation of reliability requirements. Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) seem to be suitable MCDM methods for achieving optimal reliability allocation. The practical application of proposed methods based on AHP is illustrated on

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reliability Requirements Allocation for Combat Vehicle Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making

Popis výsledku anglicky

The rational apportionment of system reliability requirements among its items is a complex issue within the reliability allocation process. Equal apportionment is the simplest way to allocate requirements but it is not objective approach. Weighted apportionment that takes into account importance/weight of system items is more rational approach to allocate reliability requirements. Importance/weight of system item is usually determined using selected criteria. The determination of items importance in system structure with respect to the criteria might be construed as a matter of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The paper offers the utilization of MCDM methods as a powerful tool for evaluating system items importance with the goal to achieve optimal allocation of reliability requirements. Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) seem to be suitable MCDM methods for achieving optimal reliability allocation. The practical application of proposed methods based on AHP is illustrated on

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

KA - Vojenství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the International Conference on Military Technologies 2013

ISBN

978-80-7231-917-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

133-143

Název nakladatele

Univerzita obrany, Brno

Místo vydání

Brno

Místo konání akce

Brno

Datum konání akce

1. 1. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—