Productivity and efficiency: Do we need a bridge?
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41110%2F24%3A101341" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41110/24:101341 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925527324001440" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925527324001440</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109287" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109287</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Productivity and efficiency: Do we need a bridge?
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The paper focuses on comparing two popular approaches to estimating firm production technology: the proxyvariable method and the stochastic frontier (SF) analysis approach. We show that although the economic interpretations of productivity and efficiency are not the same, the difference between them is not fundamental and even trivial as far as the estimation techniques are concerned when the same structural framework is assumed. By showing the connection and comparing the difference between these two methods, this paper is aimed at building a bridge to connect these two strands of literature. In addition, we provide the SF audience with a new estimation method, i.e., the modified proxy -variable method, with its advantages in handling the endogeneity issue, along with a new way to estimate technical inefficiency. We examine their finite sample performance using Monte Carlo simulations. In the empirical section, we compare the proposed estimator with the conventional MLE SF estimator using Chinese manufacturing firms in the computer and peripheral sector over the period 1998 to 2007. We find that the estimates from our method are more reasonable in explaining the production behavior of these firms, and firms' technical inefficiency levels are highly persistent over time.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Productivity and efficiency: Do we need a bridge?
Popis výsledku anglicky
The paper focuses on comparing two popular approaches to estimating firm production technology: the proxyvariable method and the stochastic frontier (SF) analysis approach. We show that although the economic interpretations of productivity and efficiency are not the same, the difference between them is not fundamental and even trivial as far as the estimation techniques are concerned when the same structural framework is assumed. By showing the connection and comparing the difference between these two methods, this paper is aimed at building a bridge to connect these two strands of literature. In addition, we provide the SF audience with a new estimation method, i.e., the modified proxy -variable method, with its advantages in handling the endogeneity issue, along with a new way to estimate technical inefficiency. We examine their finite sample performance using Monte Carlo simulations. In the empirical section, we compare the proposed estimator with the conventional MLE SF estimator using Chinese manufacturing firms in the computer and peripheral sector over the period 1998 to 2007. We find that the estimates from our method are more reasonable in explaining the production behavior of these firms, and firms' technical inefficiency levels are highly persistent over time.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
ISSN
0925-5273
e-ISSN
0925-5273
Svazek periodika
274
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
neuvedeno
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
1-13
Kód UT WoS článku
001257558600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85195187680