Medium-density Fiberboard (MDF) and Edge-glued Panels (EGP) after Edge Milling - Surface Roughness after Machining with Different Parameters

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60460709%3A41320%2F18%3A77757" target="_blank" >RIV/60460709:41320/18:77757 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.1.2005-2021" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.1.2005-2021</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.1.2005-2021" target="_blank" >10.15376/biores.13.1.2005-2021</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Medium-density Fiberboard (MDF) and Edge-glued Panels (EGP) after Edge Milling - Surface Roughness after Machining with Different Parameters

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The mean arithmetic deviation of the roughness profile was investigated during cylindrical milling of the board edges. The machined materials were a medium-density fiberboard, medium-density fiberboard with single-sided lamination, and edge-glued spruce panel. Contactless and contact profilometers were used to measure the roughness. Both methods were evaluated and compared. Tungsten carbide blades with three different compositions and treatments were used. The effect of the cutting speed (20 m s, 30 m s, 40 m s, and 60 m s) and feed rate (4 m min, 8 m min, and 11 m min) on the surface roughness was also monitored. The results of this study compared two different methods for determining the surface roughness. The measurements were more accurate with a contactless profilometer, but the price is higher than that of the contact method. The operation was also more complicated, and the measurement itself took longer with a contactless profilometer. The evaluation of individual surface quality variables was

Název v anglickém jazyce

Medium-density Fiberboard (MDF) and Edge-glued Panels (EGP) after Edge Milling - Surface Roughness after Machining with Different Parameters

Popis výsledku anglicky

The mean arithmetic deviation of the roughness profile was investigated during cylindrical milling of the board edges. The machined materials were a medium-density fiberboard, medium-density fiberboard with single-sided lamination, and edge-glued spruce panel. Contactless and contact profilometers were used to measure the roughness. Both methods were evaluated and compared. Tungsten carbide blades with three different compositions and treatments were used. The effect of the cutting speed (20 m s, 30 m s, 40 m s, and 60 m s) and feed rate (4 m min, 8 m min, and 11 m min) on the surface roughness was also monitored. The results of this study compared two different methods for determining the surface roughness. The measurements were more accurate with a contactless profilometer, but the price is higher than that of the contact method. The operation was also more complicated, and the measurement itself took longer with a contactless profilometer. The evaluation of individual surface quality variables was

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20502 - Paper and wood

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BioResources

ISSN

1930-2126

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

2005-2021

Kód UT WoS článku

000427790000143

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85041290594