Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Testing scales for attitude towards beer: The case of two brands of beer of the same producer

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60461373%3A22340%2F17%3A43915199" target="_blank" >RIV/60461373:22340/17:43915199 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60461373:22810/17:43915199

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://ap.pef.czu.cz/dl/58880?lang=en" target="_blank" >https://ap.pef.czu.cz/dl/58880?lang=en</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Testing scales for attitude towards beer: The case of two brands of beer of the same producer

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    There is an increasing amount of literature focused on beer purchase and consumption, both micro- and macro-economic studies. The aim of the paper is to tests scales for attitudes towards Tuborg and Carlsberg beers, and to compare Cronbach&apos;s alphas for the two brands when evaluated by the same respondents. Both brands are produced by the Carlsberg Group, and both are lagers. The Carlsberg Group markets Tuborg as a more premium brand, and it also aims at women. The research was conducted in Denmark using an on-line questionnaire. The attitudes were measured in three dimensions - affective, cognitive, and conative. Affective and cognitive dimensions were measured using already validated instruments, while the conative dimension (for which no validated instrument was found) is based on consumption of a particular brand of beer. With regards to finding, Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the affective dimension was .944 for Tuborg and .956 for Carlsberg; Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the cognitive dimension was .785 for Tuborg and .886 for Carlsberg; and Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the conative dimension was .843 for Tuborg and .906 for Carlsberg. Although all scales had their Cronbach&apos;s alphas over .7, it is surprising that the difference in Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the cognitive dimension for the two brands was approximately .1 in spite of the fact that the statements for the scales were evaluated at the same time by the same respondents.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Testing scales for attitude towards beer: The case of two brands of beer of the same producer

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    There is an increasing amount of literature focused on beer purchase and consumption, both micro- and macro-economic studies. The aim of the paper is to tests scales for attitudes towards Tuborg and Carlsberg beers, and to compare Cronbach&apos;s alphas for the two brands when evaluated by the same respondents. Both brands are produced by the Carlsberg Group, and both are lagers. The Carlsberg Group markets Tuborg as a more premium brand, and it also aims at women. The research was conducted in Denmark using an on-line questionnaire. The attitudes were measured in three dimensions - affective, cognitive, and conative. Affective and cognitive dimensions were measured using already validated instruments, while the conative dimension (for which no validated instrument was found) is based on consumption of a particular brand of beer. With regards to finding, Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the affective dimension was .944 for Tuborg and .956 for Carlsberg; Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the cognitive dimension was .785 for Tuborg and .886 for Carlsberg; and Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the conative dimension was .843 for Tuborg and .906 for Carlsberg. Although all scales had their Cronbach&apos;s alphas over .7, it is surprising that the difference in Cronbach&apos;s alpha for the cognitive dimension for the two brands was approximately .1 in spite of the fact that the statements for the scales were evaluated at the same time by the same respondents.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    Proceedings of the 26th International Scientific Conference Agrarian Perspectives XXVI : Competitiveness of European Agriculture and Food Sectors

  • ISBN

    978-80-213-2787-0

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

    neuvedeno

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    375-381

  • Název nakladatele

    Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze (ČZU)

  • Místo vydání

    Praha

  • Místo konání akce

    Praha

  • Datum konání akce

    13. 9. 2017

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    EUR - Evropská akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000417392400051