Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Students' motivation types in the smart approach to ESP instruction

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61988987%3A17450%2F21%3AA2202AQY" target="_blank" >RIV/61988987:17450/21:A2202AQY - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/6677/1749" target="_blank" >https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/6677/1749</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6677" target="_blank" >10.14742/ajet.6677</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Students' motivation types in the smart approach to ESP instruction

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article focuses on the smart approach applied in teaching two topics (referred to as learning contents) within English for Specific Purposes with regard to students' motivation types. It introduces results of the research conducted in this field. The research is based on the definition of the term smart set by Silverio-Fernandez et al. (2018) and the theory of motivation types created by Plaminek (2010), who designed the standardised Motivation Type Inventory distinguishing four motivation types (accurators, coordinators, directors, explorers). Data were collected via didactic tests; quantitative methods were applied to calculate the potential increase in students' knowledge as a difference between pre-test and post-test scores in the didactic tests. In total, 119 prospective teachers from the Faculty of Education and the Faculty of Science at Jan Evangelista Purkyne University participated in this research conducted via quasi-experimental ex-post-facto method for 12 weeks. The smart approach included the exploitation of smart devices and technologies (applications) in faceto-face instruction and in-home preparation for lessons. Three main hypotheses were set to prove whether the smart approach to ESP instruction can be applied to learners of all motivation types. According to the findings, the smart approach suited students of all motivation types; however, coordinators' increase in knowledge was significantly higher compared to explorers and directors in one of the learning contents.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Students' motivation types in the smart approach to ESP instruction

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article focuses on the smart approach applied in teaching two topics (referred to as learning contents) within English for Specific Purposes with regard to students' motivation types. It introduces results of the research conducted in this field. The research is based on the definition of the term smart set by Silverio-Fernandez et al. (2018) and the theory of motivation types created by Plaminek (2010), who designed the standardised Motivation Type Inventory distinguishing four motivation types (accurators, coordinators, directors, explorers). Data were collected via didactic tests; quantitative methods were applied to calculate the potential increase in students' knowledge as a difference between pre-test and post-test scores in the didactic tests. In total, 119 prospective teachers from the Faculty of Education and the Faculty of Science at Jan Evangelista Purkyne University participated in this research conducted via quasi-experimental ex-post-facto method for 12 weeks. The smart approach included the exploitation of smart devices and technologies (applications) in faceto-face instruction and in-home preparation for lessons. Three main hypotheses were set to prove whether the smart approach to ESP instruction can be applied to learners of all motivation types. According to the findings, the smart approach suited students of all motivation types; however, coordinators' increase in knowledge was significantly higher compared to explorers and directors in one of the learning contents.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    O - Projekt operacniho programu

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

  • ISSN

    1449-5554

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    37

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    2, SI

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    AU - Austrálie

  • Počet stran výsledku

    15

  • Strana od-do

    66-80

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000650199300005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus