Assessment of Corporate Social Performance Based on MADM Methods

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989100%3A27510%2F15%3A86094240" target="_blank" >RIV/61989100:27510/15:86094240 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessment of Corporate Social Performance Based on MADM Methods

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Together with the managerial decision to run a business in accordance with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) principles, important questions dealing with the necessity of systematic CSR evaluation and measurement should be answered. The main aim of this paper is connected with the application of the multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods such as group decision-making analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a complex CSR assessment of selected telecommunication organizations operating in the Czech Republic. A group of stakeholders was asked to participate in a preferences appraisal of criteria and sub-criteria of a hierarchically structured decision-making task based on Saaty's Pairwise Comparison method. Their opinions and judgements were analysed by computations of Consistency Ratio, Geometric Consistency Index, AHP Consensus Indicator and Geometric Ordinal Consensus Index.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessment of Corporate Social Performance Based on MADM Methods

Popis výsledku anglicky

Together with the managerial decision to run a business in accordance with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) principles, important questions dealing with the necessity of systematic CSR evaluation and measurement should be answered. The main aim of this paper is connected with the application of the multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) methods such as group decision-making analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in a complex CSR assessment of selected telecommunication organizations operating in the Czech Republic. A group of stakeholders was asked to participate in a preferences appraisal of criteria and sub-criteria of a hierarchically structured decision-making task based on Saaty's Pairwise Comparison method. Their opinions and judgements were analysed by computations of Consistency Ratio, Geometric Consistency Index, AHP Consensus Indicator and Geometric Ordinal Consensus Index.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on IS Management and Evaluation : The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 21-22 September 2015

ISBN

978-1-910810-54-5

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

275 - 284

Název nakladatele

Academic Conferences and Publishing International

Místo vydání

Reading

Místo konání akce

Bristol

Datum konání akce

21. 9. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—