Vaginal use of micronized progesterone for luteal support. A randomized study comparing Utrogestan((R)) and Crinone((R)) 8%

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F17%3A73585921" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15110/17:73585921 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Vaginal use of micronized progesterone for luteal support. A randomized study comparing Utrogestan((R)) and Crinone((R)) 8%

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background and Objective. Luteal phase physiology is distorted by in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation leads to luteal phase defect and for this reason, luteal phase support is now an integral part of IVF/ICSI-ET programs. The support is provided by hCG, progesterone or GnRH-a. This study compared the efficiency, safety and tolerance of two vaginal micronized progesterones, Utrogestan and Crinone 8%. Methods. 111 women, 18-40 years old, FSH &lt; 10 IU/L and normal uterus findings were included. The efficiency of the two preparations to provide luteal support was evaluated by the fertilization, implantation, pregnancy and take-home baby rates. The safety was compared through the results of vaginal findings and vaginal inflammation markers before and after treatment. Comparison of tolerance was made by evaluating 21 subjective patient questionnaire parameters. Results. There were no significant differences between the preparations in terms of efficiency or safety though Crinone 8% was better tolerated.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Vaginal use of micronized progesterone for luteal support. A randomized study comparing Utrogestan((R)) and Crinone((R)) 8%

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background and Objective. Luteal phase physiology is distorted by in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation leads to luteal phase defect and for this reason, luteal phase support is now an integral part of IVF/ICSI-ET programs. The support is provided by hCG, progesterone or GnRH-a. This study compared the efficiency, safety and tolerance of two vaginal micronized progesterones, Utrogestan and Crinone 8%. Methods. 111 women, 18-40 years old, FSH &lt; 10 IU/L and normal uterus findings were included. The efficiency of the two preparations to provide luteal support was evaluated by the fertilization, implantation, pregnancy and take-home baby rates. The safety was compared through the results of vaginal findings and vaginal inflammation markers before and after treatment. Comparison of tolerance was made by evaluating 21 subjective patient questionnaire parameters. Results. There were no significant differences between the preparations in terms of efficiency or safety though Crinone 8% was better tolerated.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC

ISSN

1213-8118

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

161

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

86-91

Kód UT WoS článku

000398093500013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85016282063