PREDICTORS OF RUMINATION REFLECTION AND RUMINATION BROODING: THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15210%2F22%3A73615761" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15210/22:73615761 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2440113" target="_blank" >https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2440113</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33171/dtcfjournal.2022.62.2.31" target="_blank" >10.33171/dtcfjournal.2022.62.2.31</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

PREDICTORS OF RUMINATION REFLECTION AND RUMINATION BROODING: THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Past research has shown that rumination is a multifaced construct and two types of rumination were distinguished, reflection (adaptive contemplation) and brooding (pessimistic thinking style). Although they are related, brooding and reflection are considered different constructs. Self-determination theory proposes that there are three basic psychological needs, namely autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are essential for human functioning and well-being. The frustration of these needs can create a discrepancy between actual and ideal states of goal attainment (satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence), which initiate rumination about unattained goals. Grounded on self-determination theory, the present study aimed to examine the link between need satisfaction and frustration and dimensions of rumination with a cross-sectional design. The data of the present study were collected during the Pandemic. Undergraduate university students (N = 464, female 69%, Mage = 21.90, SD = 2.88) from different departments of a major state university in Turkey participated in the current study. Ruminative Response Scale-Short Form and Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale were administered via an online survey tool. Results showed that while the brooding dimension of rumination was predicted by the frustration of autonomy, relatedness, and competence need, the reflection dimension was predicted by relatedness and competence frustration. Need frustration explained unique variance in brooding and reflection. Although the reflection dimension of rumination is considered adaptive, the results showed that it might be a maladaptive coping strategy under a highly controlling and uncertain environment. The findings of the present research suggest that supporting need satisfaction has critical importance in decreasing rumination.

Název v anglickém jazyce

PREDICTORS OF RUMINATION REFLECTION AND RUMINATION BROODING: THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY PERSPECTIVE

Popis výsledku anglicky

Past research has shown that rumination is a multifaced construct and two types of rumination were distinguished, reflection (adaptive contemplation) and brooding (pessimistic thinking style). Although they are related, brooding and reflection are considered different constructs. Self-determination theory proposes that there are three basic psychological needs, namely autonomy, competence, and relatedness, which are essential for human functioning and well-being. The frustration of these needs can create a discrepancy between actual and ideal states of goal attainment (satisfaction of the needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence), which initiate rumination about unattained goals. Grounded on self-determination theory, the present study aimed to examine the link between need satisfaction and frustration and dimensions of rumination with a cross-sectional design. The data of the present study were collected during the Pandemic. Undergraduate university students (N = 464, female 69%, Mage = 21.90, SD = 2.88) from different departments of a major state university in Turkey participated in the current study. Ruminative Response Scale-Short Form and Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale were administered via an online survey tool. Results showed that while the brooding dimension of rumination was predicted by the frustration of autonomy, relatedness, and competence need, the reflection dimension was predicted by relatedness and competence frustration. Need frustration explained unique variance in brooding and reflection. Although the reflection dimension of rumination is considered adaptive, the results showed that it might be a maladaptive coping strategy under a highly controlling and uncertain environment. The findings of the present research suggest that supporting need satisfaction has critical importance in decreasing rumination.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Journal of the Faculty of Languages and History-Geography

ISSN

0378-2905

e-ISSN

2459-0150

Svazek periodika

2022

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

62(2)

Stát vydavatele periodika

TR - Turecká republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

1555-1573

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—