Comments on the large deformation elastic beam model developed by DY Gao

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F20%3A73603142" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/20:73603142 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009364132030135X" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009364132030135X</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103607" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103607</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comments on the large deformation elastic beam model developed by DY Gao

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In this comment mathematical formulations concerning the nonlinear beam model published in Gao [1] are analysed. The beam is subjected to vertical and axial loading (at its right end). This model can be especially used to study post-buckling problems, but in this paper we focus only on convex cases. However, some inconsistency between properties of bending problems and their convexity bounds was discovered by the authors of this comment. This is concerned with definition of an integral constant, which is in Gao [1] not strictly determined, only later in Santos and Gao [3]. In this comment there is proposed an alternative definition of this constant which should solve the mentioned discrepancy. Except this one, no in-depth revision of the considered beam model is intended here.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comments on the large deformation elastic beam model developed by DY Gao

Popis výsledku anglicky

In this comment mathematical formulations concerning the nonlinear beam model published in Gao [1] are analysed. The beam is subjected to vertical and axial loading (at its right end). This model can be especially used to study post-buckling problems, but in this paper we focus only on convex cases. However, some inconsistency between properties of bending problems and their convexity bounds was discovered by the authors of this comment. This is concerned with definition of an integral constant, which is in Gao [1] not strictly determined, only later in Santos and Gao [3]. In this comment there is proposed an alternative definition of this constant which should solve the mentioned discrepancy. Except this one, no in-depth revision of the considered beam model is intended here.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10102 - Applied mathematics

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF17_049%2F0008408" target="_blank" >EF17_049/0008408: Hydrodynamický design čerpadel</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

MECHANICS RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN

0093-6413

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

110

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

DEC

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

"103607-1"-"103607-5"

Kód UT WoS článku

000593983000008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85093931950