Swipe versus multiple view: a comprehensive analysis using eye-tracking to evaluate user interaction with web maps
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F61989592%3A15310%2F22%3A73610429" target="_blank" >RIV/61989592:15310/22:73610429 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/15230406.2021.2015721" target="_blank" >https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/15230406.2021.2015721</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2021.2015721" target="_blank" >10.1080/15230406.2021.2015721</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Swipe versus multiple view: a comprehensive analysis using eye-tracking to evaluate user interaction with web maps
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The comparison of multiple maps is a common fundamental process used by geographers to explore the world. The most frequently applied interactive methods for the comparison of maps are multiple view and swipe. Swipe allows the user to interactively drag and overlap two different maps. Multiple view is based on the simultaneous side-by-side display of several maps. The current paper presents an analysis of the use of these two map comparison techniques in an Esri environment using an eye-tracking study which involved 25 participants. The participants completed two different tasks which compared land suitability using two or four maps. Based on an analysis of the recorded data, we compared the effectiveness of these methods through the accuracy of answers, the trial duration, and eye-tracking metrics of the individual compositional elements of the interactive maps. Cognitive processing was investigated through the analysis of dynamic areas of interest. This labor-intensive analysis yielded results which could be visualized using sequence charts. Based on these analyses, we concluded that the participants worked more effectively with multiple views, especially in comparing four maps. Working with swipe in the Esri environment is non-intuitive in comparisons of more than two maps. Many participants instead preferred simple toggling between layers instead of interactive swipe comparisons. However, when swipe was used to compare two maps, the method was more efficient, especially during cognitively demanding tasks.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Swipe versus multiple view: a comprehensive analysis using eye-tracking to evaluate user interaction with web maps
Popis výsledku anglicky
The comparison of multiple maps is a common fundamental process used by geographers to explore the world. The most frequently applied interactive methods for the comparison of maps are multiple view and swipe. Swipe allows the user to interactively drag and overlap two different maps. Multiple view is based on the simultaneous side-by-side display of several maps. The current paper presents an analysis of the use of these two map comparison techniques in an Esri environment using an eye-tracking study which involved 25 participants. The participants completed two different tasks which compared land suitability using two or four maps. Based on an analysis of the recorded data, we compared the effectiveness of these methods through the accuracy of answers, the trial duration, and eye-tracking metrics of the individual compositional elements of the interactive maps. Cognitive processing was investigated through the analysis of dynamic areas of interest. This labor-intensive analysis yielded results which could be visualized using sequence charts. Based on these analyses, we concluded that the participants worked more effectively with multiple views, especially in comparing four maps. Working with swipe in the Esri environment is non-intuitive in comparisons of more than two maps. Many participants instead preferred simple toggling between layers instead of interactive swipe comparisons. However, when swipe was used to compare two maps, the method was more efficient, especially during cognitively demanding tasks.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50702 - Urban studies (planning and development)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/DG18P02OVV017" target="_blank" >DG18P02OVV017: Historická krajina na pomezí Slezska a Moravy</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Cartography and Geographic Information Science
ISSN
1523-0406
e-ISSN
1545-0465
Svazek periodika
49
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
252-270
Kód UT WoS článku
000746802600001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85123830671