Evaluation of stallion sperm concentration by two different methods and its influence on sperm motility assessment
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62156489%3A43210%2F21%3A43921084" target="_blank" >RIV/62156489:43210/21:43921084 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2021.24.04.293-296" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2021.24.04.293-296</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.15414/AFZ.2021.24.04.293-296" target="_blank" >10.15414/AFZ.2021.24.04.293-296</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Evaluation of stallion sperm concentration by two different methods and its influence on sperm motility assessment
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of this study was to compare two methods for determining the concentration of sperm in stallion ejaculate and to evaluate the influence of different levels of concentration on the determination of sperm motility using an objective method. The total number of evaluated samples was 123. For the experiment, 14 stallions of different breeds housed in the Tlumačov Provincial Stud Farm were used. Sperm concentration was assessed by the hemocytometric method using a Bürker chamber and the automatic method using the Sperm Class Analyzer(R). The SCA system was used to evaluate sperm motility. The samples were divided into 6 groups with sperm concentrations of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300.106 sperm ml-1. The results were statistically evaluated by Tukey's HSD test. There were statistically significant differences in the determination of sperm concentrations between the hemocytometric method and the SCA system in samples with concentration exceeding 100.106 sperm ml-1. Sperm motility increased in samples with higher concentration, however the effect of sperm concentration on motility parameters has not been statistically significant. The results of this study indicate that samples with sperm concentration higher than 100.106 sperm ml-1 reduce the accuracy of the SCA system evaluation and these samples need to be diluted to concentration LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO100.106 sperm ml-1 for more accurate evaluation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Evaluation of stallion sperm concentration by two different methods and its influence on sperm motility assessment
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of this study was to compare two methods for determining the concentration of sperm in stallion ejaculate and to evaluate the influence of different levels of concentration on the determination of sperm motility using an objective method. The total number of evaluated samples was 123. For the experiment, 14 stallions of different breeds housed in the Tlumačov Provincial Stud Farm were used. Sperm concentration was assessed by the hemocytometric method using a Bürker chamber and the automatic method using the Sperm Class Analyzer(R). The SCA system was used to evaluate sperm motility. The samples were divided into 6 groups with sperm concentrations of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300.106 sperm ml-1. The results were statistically evaluated by Tukey's HSD test. There were statistically significant differences in the determination of sperm concentrations between the hemocytometric method and the SCA system in samples with concentration exceeding 100.106 sperm ml-1. Sperm motility increased in samples with higher concentration, however the effect of sperm concentration on motility parameters has not been statistically significant. The results of this study indicate that samples with sperm concentration higher than 100.106 sperm ml-1 reduce the accuracy of the SCA system evaluation and these samples need to be diluted to concentration LESS-THAN OR EQUAL TO100.106 sperm ml-1 for more accurate evaluation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40201 - Animal and dairy science; (Animal biotechnology to be 4.4)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
ISSN
1335-258X
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
293-296
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85123091497