Relativism and Culture in Political Argumentation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F06%3A00003491" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/06:00003491 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Relativism and Culture in Political Argumentation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The chapter aims to explore the philosophical debate of political argumentation, especially within the framework of the analytic philosophy tradition. Its primary objective is not to evaluate contemporary political debate but rather to provide a broaderphilosophical context. More specifically, my aim is to prove that the above concepts are generally used more or less inadequately, which is caused partly by the theoretical imprecision of the concept of "culture" and partly by the insufficient level of discussion of the problems of epistemic and ethical relativism. In particular, my argumentation aims to elucidate the interconnectedness of philosophy, social sciences and the employment of the concepts of these sciences outside the theoretical framework(their common sense usage). I attempt to show that a political argumentation that does not rest on a firm conceptual foundation looses its argumentative force and becomes unpersuasive and "impractical" in a broad sense of the word.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Relativism and Culture in Political Argumentation

Popis výsledku anglicky

The chapter aims to explore the philosophical debate of political argumentation, especially within the framework of the analytic philosophy tradition. Its primary objective is not to evaluate contemporary political debate but rather to provide a broaderphilosophical context. More specifically, my aim is to prove that the above concepts are generally used more or less inadequately, which is caused partly by the theoretical imprecision of the concept of "culture" and partly by the insufficient level of discussion of the problems of epistemic and ethical relativism. In particular, my argumentation aims to elucidate the interconnectedness of philosophy, social sciences and the employment of the concepts of these sciences outside the theoretical framework(their common sense usage). I attempt to show that a political argumentation that does not rest on a firm conceptual foundation looses its argumentative force and becomes unpersuasive and "impractical" in a broad sense of the word.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2006

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Hope : probing the boundaries

ISBN

978-1-904710-41-7

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

—

Počet stran knihy

332

Název nakladatele

Inter-disciplinary press

Místo vydání

Oxford

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—