Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F21%3A50018063" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/21:50018063 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10503-020-09524-0</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper concerns the character of argumentation in inner dialogue, i.e. dialogue that an individual keeps to herself in her own mind. The problem of inner dialogue research is the methodological difficulty connected with its externalization. In the text, the activity of crisis diary-writing is suggested as a way of naturally externalizing inner decision-making. By adopting a pragma-dialectic approach to argumentation, the text attempts to characterize crisis diary-writing as an argumentative activity type. The argumentative characterization of crisis diary-writing involves identifying the institutional point and implemented genre as well as distinguishing the empirical counterparts of the four stages of critical discussion. For illustration, the paper draws its examples from Anne Frank’s Diary. As a result of the characterization achieved in the paper, it is concluded that crisis diary-writing is a conventionalized deliberative activity type preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Crisis Diary-Writing as a Communicative Activity Type

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper concerns the character of argumentation in inner dialogue, i.e. dialogue that an individual keeps to herself in her own mind. The problem of inner dialogue research is the methodological difficulty connected with its externalization. In the text, the activity of crisis diary-writing is suggested as a way of naturally externalizing inner decision-making. By adopting a pragma-dialectic approach to argumentation, the text attempts to characterize crisis diary-writing as an argumentative activity type. The argumentative characterization of crisis diary-writing involves identifying the institutional point and implemented genre as well as distinguishing the empirical counterparts of the four stages of critical discussion. For illustration, the paper draws its examples from Anne Frank’s Diary. As a result of the characterization achieved in the paper, it is concluded that crisis diary-writing is a conventionalized deliberative activity type preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-14095S" target="_blank" >GA19-14095S: Podoby (sebe-)přesvědčování v osobních denících</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Argumentation

ISSN

0920-427X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

35

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

28

Strana od-do

237-264

Kód UT WoS článku

000539857000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—