Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F22%3A50019484" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/22:50019484 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.21014.sva" target="_blank" >https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/jaic.21014.sva</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.21014.sva" target="_blank" >10.1075/jaic.21014.sva</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is focused on the practice of private diary-writing as an act of externalizing internal communication from the point of view of the theory of argumentation. It is demonstrated that through diary-writing, various forms of internal negotiation can be implemented. The paper sheds light on three ways internal negotiation is externalized through diary writing: reflective diary writing, crisis diary writing and self-encouraging diary writing. It is shown that these communicative practices occur with respect to specific exigencies of a diarist, and with respect to these specific exigencies, they differ in the type of argumentation that can be submitted in the writings. For the argumentative characterization of these practices, the concept of the communicative activity type introduced within a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation is used. It is shown that distinguished diary-writing practices are differently conventionalized activity types that are preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Three forms of internal negotiation through the activity of private diary-writing

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is focused on the practice of private diary-writing as an act of externalizing internal communication from the point of view of the theory of argumentation. It is demonstrated that through diary-writing, various forms of internal negotiation can be implemented. The paper sheds light on three ways internal negotiation is externalized through diary writing: reflective diary writing, crisis diary writing and self-encouraging diary writing. It is shown that these communicative practices occur with respect to specific exigencies of a diarist, and with respect to these specific exigencies, they differ in the type of argumentation that can be submitted in the writings. For the argumentative characterization of these practices, the concept of the communicative activity type introduced within a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation is used. It is shown that distinguished diary-writing practices are differently conventionalized activity types that are preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-14095S" target="_blank" >GA19-14095S: Podoby (sebe-)přesvědčování v osobních denících</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Argumentation in Context

ISSN

2211-4742

e-ISSN

2211-4750

Svazek periodika

11

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

35

Strana od-do

243-277

Kód UT WoS článku

000864757000004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85140254463