Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F22%3A50019723" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/22:50019723 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6974" target="_blank" >https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/6974</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/il.v42i4.6974" target="_blank" >10.22329/il.v42i4.6974</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper is focused on the practice of unsolicited, reflective diary writing as an act of externalizing internal dialogue. I suggest that it should be analyzed as an argumentative practice from the point of view of pragma-dialectics. In the first part of the paper, I demonstrate that internal communication can be examined from the perspective of pragma-dialectics because it is in line with its meta-theoretical principles (especially socialization and externalization). In the second part, I suggest that reflective diary writing should be conceived of as an argumentative activity type. I show that this practice is a conventionalized activity type that is preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Characterizing Reflective Diary Writing as an Argumentative Activity Type

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper is focused on the practice of unsolicited, reflective diary writing as an act of externalizing internal dialogue. I suggest that it should be analyzed as an argumentative practice from the point of view of pragma-dialectics. In the first part of the paper, I demonstrate that internal communication can be examined from the perspective of pragma-dialectics because it is in line with its meta-theoretical principles (especially socialization and externalization). In the second part, I suggest that reflective diary writing should be conceived of as an argumentative activity type. I show that this practice is a conventionalized activity type that is preconditioned by implicit norms governing the conduct of argumentation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-14095S" target="_blank" >GA19-14095S: Podoby (sebe-)přesvědčování v osobních denících</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Informal Logic

ISSN

0824-2577

e-ISSN

0824-2577

Svazek periodika

42

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CA - Kanada

Počet stran výsledku

43

Strana od-do

705-747

Kód UT WoS článku

000899754300003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85148643563