The Metaphysics of Practical Rationality: Intentional and Deontic Cognition

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F62690094%3A18460%2F21%3A50018226" target="_blank" >RIV/62690094:18460/21:50018226 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://docplayer.net/210561951-The-metaphysics-of-practical-rationality-intentional-and-deontic-cognition-1.html" target="_blank" >https://docplayer.net/210561951-The-metaphysics-of-practical-rationality-intentional-and-deontic-cognition-1.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.35" target="_blank" >10.1017/apa.2020.35</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Metaphysics of Practical Rationality: Intentional and Deontic Cognition

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Despite growing appreciation in recent decades of the importance of shared intentional mental states as a foundation for everything from divergences in primate evolution, to the institution of communal norms, to trends in the development of modernity as a sociopolitical phenomenon, we lack an adequate understanding of the relationship between individual and shared intentionality. At the same time, it is widely appreciated that deontic reasoning concerning what ought, may, and ought not be done is, like reasoning about our intentions, an exercise of practical rationality. Taking advantage of this fact, I use a plantheoretic semantics for the deontic modalities as a basis for understanding individual and shared intentions. This results in a view that accords well with what we currently have reason to believe about the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of norm psychology and shared intentionality in human beings, and where original intentionality can be understood in terms of the shared intentionality of a community.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Metaphysics of Practical Rationality: Intentional and Deontic Cognition

Popis výsledku anglicky

Despite growing appreciation in recent decades of the importance of shared intentional mental states as a foundation for everything from divergences in primate evolution, to the institution of communal norms, to trends in the development of modernity as a sociopolitical phenomenon, we lack an adequate understanding of the relationship between individual and shared intentionality. At the same time, it is widely appreciated that deontic reasoning concerning what ought, may, and ought not be done is, like reasoning about our intentions, an exercise of practical rationality. Taking advantage of this fact, I use a plantheoretic semantics for the deontic modalities as a basis for understanding individual and shared intentions. This results in a view that accords well with what we currently have reason to believe about the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of norm psychology and shared intentionality in human beings, and where original intentionality can be understood in terms of the shared intentionality of a community.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GF17-33808L" target="_blank" >GF17-33808L: Inferencializmus a kolektivní intencionalita</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of the American Philosophical Association

ISSN

2053-4477

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

20

Strana od-do

549-568

Kód UT WoS článku

000737960800009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85113142271