Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Defining evidence-based nursing practice: An interpretative phenomenological study

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F65269705%3A_____%2F25%3A00080418" target="_blank" >RIV/65269705:_____/25:00080418 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216224:14110/25:00140349

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003101?pes=vor" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003101?pes=vor</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106400" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106400</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Defining evidence-based nursing practice: An interpretative phenomenological study

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Evidence-based nursing practice (EBNP) has been regarded core competencies in nursing practice and education. Defining evidence-based nursing practice and translating evidence into nursing practice by nursing students who are green to clinical practice in their education journey remain unclear. Aim: To explore how pre-registered nursing students define and characterize evidence-based nursing practice as they participate in their clinical practicum. Design: This study used an interpretive phenomenological qualitative study design. Settings and participants: Twenty nursing students were interviewed for their clinical practicum experience from four universities, one nursing college and one hospital-based nursing school in Hong Kong. Methods: Data was generated through semi-structured in-depth interview and analyzed following interpretative phenomenological analysis guidelines, using a cyclical coding process. Results: Four themes emerged regarding nursing students&apos; definition of EBNP, highlighting that EBNP is &apos;identifying a reliable learning source&apos;, by which they can &apos;rationalize their nursing practice&apos;, and enabling them to &apos;establish care standard through critical thinking&apos;, and eventual &apos;fostering their professionalism&apos; to improve health outcomes and reduce potential harms. Conclusion: Nursing students defined and characterized evidence-based nursing practice as core competencies in accompany their practicum that enables them to learn and grow professionally with a universal desire to be qualified, cope with doubt, and improve patient outcome. They recognized the challenges in identifying evidence and emphasized conservative approach to validate the evidence to avoid patient harm. Students expressed doubt towards their instructors EBNP when observing procedures untaught at school, which requires the curriculum model to foster students&apos; skills in applying and appraising evidence and instructors&apos; capacity to rationalize and role model EBNP. (C) 2024 Elsevier Ltd

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Defining evidence-based nursing practice: An interpretative phenomenological study

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Evidence-based nursing practice (EBNP) has been regarded core competencies in nursing practice and education. Defining evidence-based nursing practice and translating evidence into nursing practice by nursing students who are green to clinical practice in their education journey remain unclear. Aim: To explore how pre-registered nursing students define and characterize evidence-based nursing practice as they participate in their clinical practicum. Design: This study used an interpretive phenomenological qualitative study design. Settings and participants: Twenty nursing students were interviewed for their clinical practicum experience from four universities, one nursing college and one hospital-based nursing school in Hong Kong. Methods: Data was generated through semi-structured in-depth interview and analyzed following interpretative phenomenological analysis guidelines, using a cyclical coding process. Results: Four themes emerged regarding nursing students&apos; definition of EBNP, highlighting that EBNP is &apos;identifying a reliable learning source&apos;, by which they can &apos;rationalize their nursing practice&apos;, and enabling them to &apos;establish care standard through critical thinking&apos;, and eventual &apos;fostering their professionalism&apos; to improve health outcomes and reduce potential harms. Conclusion: Nursing students defined and characterized evidence-based nursing practice as core competencies in accompany their practicum that enables them to learn and grow professionally with a universal desire to be qualified, cope with doubt, and improve patient outcome. They recognized the challenges in identifying evidence and emphasized conservative approach to validate the evidence to avoid patient harm. Students expressed doubt towards their instructors EBNP when observing procedures untaught at school, which requires the curriculum model to foster students&apos; skills in applying and appraising evidence and instructors&apos; capacity to rationalize and role model EBNP. (C) 2024 Elsevier Ltd

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30300 - Health sciences

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Nurse Education Today

  • ISSN

    0260-6917

  • e-ISSN

    1532-2793

  • Svazek periodika

    144

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    JAN 2025

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    7

  • Strana od-do

    106400

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001321193700001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85204353099