Multi-criteria decision analysis without consistency in pairwise comparisons

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985556%3A_____%2F22%3A00557718" target="_blank" >RIV/67985556:_____/22:00557718 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/61384399:31160/22:00057998

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835222001590?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835222001590?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108089" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.cie.2022.108089</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Multi-criteria decision analysis without consistency in pairwise comparisons

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Life itself is colorful and brings situations where making the right decision is a matter of compromise given the various criteria, often conflicting with each other. To handle such situations, a plethora of mathematical methods supporting decision-making has been developed. A little attention has been paid to cases where either criteria or expert preferences are not transitive by nature. Usually, standard decision-making methods handle such a case as an input error (input inconsistency). Being designed for consistent cases, standard methods may conclude in wrong results. We present a novel framework aimed at dealing with inconsistent preferences, without forcing experts to reconsider their initial judgments thus distorting their spontaneous assessments. A simulation analysis has been led to check the methodological validity of our proposal. Specifically, by setting different consistency ranges, thousands of experiments on simulated matrices confirm that our framework represents a valid alternative to the traditional practice. The applicability of the proposed approach has been eventually demonstrated through a real-world case study focused on supply chain management of a relevant industrial problem.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Multi-criteria decision analysis without consistency in pairwise comparisons

Popis výsledku anglicky

Life itself is colorful and brings situations where making the right decision is a matter of compromise given the various criteria, often conflicting with each other. To handle such situations, a plethora of mathematical methods supporting decision-making has been developed. A little attention has been paid to cases where either criteria or expert preferences are not transitive by nature. Usually, standard decision-making methods handle such a case as an input error (input inconsistency). Being designed for consistent cases, standard methods may conclude in wrong results. We present a novel framework aimed at dealing with inconsistent preferences, without forcing experts to reconsider their initial judgments thus distorting their spontaneous assessments. A simulation analysis has been led to check the methodological validity of our proposal. Specifically, by setting different consistency ranges, thousands of experiments on simulated matrices confirm that our framework represents a valid alternative to the traditional practice. The applicability of the proposed approach has been eventually demonstrated through a real-world case study focused on supply chain management of a relevant industrial problem.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50204 - Business and management

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Computers & Industrial Engineering

ISSN

0360-8352

e-ISSN

1879-0550

Svazek periodika

168

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

108089

Kód UT WoS článku

000805828400016

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85126665738