Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F25%3A00619743" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/25:00619743 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/68081740:_____/25:00619743 RIV/00216224:14230/25:00141177

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925002193" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925002193</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113257" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.paid.2025.113257</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Objective: The present study explored the differences in networks of bullying, victimization, and well-being, along with related protective and risk factors. Network differences were investigated in adolescent samples following an antibullying intervention vs. regular school year. Methods: A sample of 671 students (52 % girls, Mage = 10.3 years) from 24 elementary schools participated across three time points. A multigroup lag-1 graphical vector autoregressive cross-lagged panel network model was employed and yielded an acceptable model fit. The final model was pruned and bootstrapped (N = 100 resamplings). Results: Several variables demonstrated stability across time points. Cross-lagged associations differed between intervention and control groups. In the absence of intervention, defending increased only when empathy for victims increased, while social self-efficacy reduced both bullying and moral disengagement. In the intervention group, defending became more interconnected with well-being, and an adverse feedback loop emerged between victimization and bullying. Contemporaneous effects were similar across intervention and control schools and showed expected associations, such as positive interrelatedness between moral disengagement and bullying perpetration. Conclusions: The antibullying intervention changed the dynamic interplay of factors related to bullying, victimization, and well-being in schools. While the outcomes were largely positive, some adverse effects emerged, which could guide future research.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Objective: The present study explored the differences in networks of bullying, victimization, and well-being, along with related protective and risk factors. Network differences were investigated in adolescent samples following an antibullying intervention vs. regular school year. Methods: A sample of 671 students (52 % girls, Mage = 10.3 years) from 24 elementary schools participated across three time points. A multigroup lag-1 graphical vector autoregressive cross-lagged panel network model was employed and yielded an acceptable model fit. The final model was pruned and bootstrapped (N = 100 resamplings). Results: Several variables demonstrated stability across time points. Cross-lagged associations differed between intervention and control groups. In the absence of intervention, defending increased only when empathy for victims increased, while social self-efficacy reduced both bullying and moral disengagement. In the intervention group, defending became more interconnected with well-being, and an adverse feedback loop emerged between victimization and bullying. Contemporaneous effects were similar across intervention and control schools and showed expected associations, such as positive interrelatedness between moral disengagement and bullying perpetration. Conclusions: The antibullying intervention changed the dynamic interplay of factors related to bullying, victimization, and well-being in schools. While the outcomes were largely positive, some adverse effects emerged, which could guide future research.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA23-06289S" target="_blank" >GA23-06289S: Následky šikany: Jak charakteristiky školních tříd zmírňují psychické potíže spojené s viktimizací</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Personality and Individual Differences

  • ISSN

    0191-8869

  • e-ISSN

    1873-3549

  • Svazek periodika

    244

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    říjen

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    113257

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001493366800001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-105004909936