Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F25%3A00619743" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/25:00619743 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68081740:_____/25:00619743 RIV/00216224:14230/25:00141177
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925002193" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925002193</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113257" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.paid.2025.113257</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: The present study explored the differences in networks of bullying, victimization, and well-being, along with related protective and risk factors. Network differences were investigated in adolescent samples following an antibullying intervention vs. regular school year. Methods: A sample of 671 students (52 % girls, Mage = 10.3 years) from 24 elementary schools participated across three time points. A multigroup lag-1 graphical vector autoregressive cross-lagged panel network model was employed and yielded an acceptable model fit. The final model was pruned and bootstrapped (N = 100 resamplings). Results: Several variables demonstrated stability across time points. Cross-lagged associations differed between intervention and control groups. In the absence of intervention, defending increased only when empathy for victims increased, while social self-efficacy reduced both bullying and moral disengagement. In the intervention group, defending became more interconnected with well-being, and an adverse feedback loop emerged between victimization and bullying. Contemporaneous effects were similar across intervention and control schools and showed expected associations, such as positive interrelatedness between moral disengagement and bullying perpetration. Conclusions: The antibullying intervention changed the dynamic interplay of factors related to bullying, victimization, and well-being in schools. While the outcomes were largely positive, some adverse effects emerged, which could guide future research.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Longitudinal network associations between risk and protective factors for bullying, victimization, and well-being: Effects of an antibullying intervention
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: The present study explored the differences in networks of bullying, victimization, and well-being, along with related protective and risk factors. Network differences were investigated in adolescent samples following an antibullying intervention vs. regular school year. Methods: A sample of 671 students (52 % girls, Mage = 10.3 years) from 24 elementary schools participated across three time points. A multigroup lag-1 graphical vector autoregressive cross-lagged panel network model was employed and yielded an acceptable model fit. The final model was pruned and bootstrapped (N = 100 resamplings). Results: Several variables demonstrated stability across time points. Cross-lagged associations differed between intervention and control groups. In the absence of intervention, defending increased only when empathy for victims increased, while social self-efficacy reduced both bullying and moral disengagement. In the intervention group, defending became more interconnected with well-being, and an adverse feedback loop emerged between victimization and bullying. Contemporaneous effects were similar across intervention and control schools and showed expected associations, such as positive interrelatedness between moral disengagement and bullying perpetration. Conclusions: The antibullying intervention changed the dynamic interplay of factors related to bullying, victimization, and well-being in schools. While the outcomes were largely positive, some adverse effects emerged, which could guide future research.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA23-06289S" target="_blank" >GA23-06289S: Následky šikany: Jak charakteristiky školních tříd zmírňují psychické potíže spojené s viktimizací</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Personality and Individual Differences
ISSN
0191-8869
e-ISSN
1873-3549
Svazek periodika
244
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
říjen
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
113257
Kód UT WoS článku
001493366800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105004909936